Item Illinois Governor Mandates LGBT History for All Public Schools
Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D) signed a bill into law on Friday that mandates all public schools in the state to teach “LGBT history” to students, emphasizing the “roles and contributions” of gays and transgenders in the history of Illinois and the United States. The law goes into effect on July 1, 2020.
The law amends the school code in Illinois. Specifically, it mandates that “the textbooks authorized to be purchased must include the roles and contributions of all people protected under the Illinois Human Rights Act and must be non-discriminatory as to any of the characteristics under the Act.”
It further “provides that textbooks purchased with grant funds must be non-discriminatory” and “that in public schools only, the teaching of history of the United States shall include a study of the roles and contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people in the history of this country and this State.”
About “discrimination”, more below.
Your children, like those pictured in the new LGBT classrooms above, will be assimilated into the Stats’s religion. Perversity will be taught as a good, as desirable, as beneficial. It will thus be that many, many kids who would have otherwise followed Reality, will instead follow Perversity.
Do not complain when the school “nurse” calls to say they want to inject foreign chemicals into little Johnny, you bigot.
Any attempt to inject Christianity back into schools will be met with shrieks of “outrage” and cries of “separation of Church and State!” There is and can be no such separation.
Item Democrat House unanimously OKs ‘gay reparations’ bill giving tax refunds to same-sex couples
The Democrat-controlled U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday approved legislation enabling “married” same-sex couples to seek millions in tax refunds for unions that were not previously recognized under federal tax law.
The PRIDE (Promoting Respect for Individuals’ Dignity and Equality) Act removes sex-specific terms such as “husband” and “wife” from the federal tax code, and allows couples “married” while the Defense of Marriage Act (which protected states and the federal government from having to recognize same-sex “marriages” from states that chose to recognize them) to claim tax refunds for which they were ineligible.
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down DOMA in 2013. The Washington Blade reported that the Joint Committee on Taxation put the estimated amount the feds could have to pay out if the bill becomes law at $67 million.
This is a tad old, but important. This is gesture legislation, a way politicians can lie brazenly and get away with it. These politicians all know such a bill has no chance of passing, not that they even want it passed. But they want to be able to point to the Republicans who still have some grip on Reality (a rapidly diminishing breed) and cry “Witch!”
Republicans now are only slightly less guilty of this sin because they have held power in recent days. Once they are out, they’ll make use of it too.
Here is the place to remind the reader that it is impossible two men can marry each other. Even if the State says they can. Which proves the State is, quite officially, insane.
Item Girls as young as 5 walk in controversial Victoria’s Secret-style lingerie show
Young girls dressed in bikinis and fluffy underwear have been pictured walking the runway at a show in a shopping centre in Chengdu, China’s Sichuan Province.
The child models are also sporting full make-up and their lingerie is accessorised with feathers, jewels and even wings — just like the famous Victoria’s Secret angels. The girls, some of whom are believed to be as young as five-years-old, take to the catwalk in small two-pieces and headresses as people in the audience take photographs.
No link is given, because the pictures are not safe, but you can find the story, from Metro UK, with an easy search, an act which cannot be recommended.
The little girls were modeling the Fall Epstein-Clinton line.
Item Welcome to the real world! Berlin’s oldest boys’ choir sued by 9yo girl for gender discrimination
A five-century-old boys’ choir has been accused of gender discrimination for not accepting a nine-year-old girl. Her woke mother is suing Berlin’s oldest musical institution for not embracing modern world realities.
The State and Cathedral Choir Berlin’s gender-based admissions criteria violate Germany’s constitution, the girl’s mother has declared, hauling the boys-only choir into court on charges that it violates her daughter’s right to equal opportunities in state support.
The internationally famous choir has never admitted any females in its 554-year history, although it has a girls-only partner choir that her daughter is welcome to join. However, the mother insists that this group is not of the same caliber as the historic boys’ institution, which was made famous by Romantic composer Felix Mendelssohn, and she says the state must step in to make things right. The family’s names have not been made public.
Equality is the Great Destroyer, the Ultimate Leveler. It’s mad pursuit is satanic and suicidal. It has caused us to reflexively, and falsely, believe that when we hear of a “discrimination” it should be removed.
Of course, it’s always about power. There will be no boys suing to get into girls’ choirs. It’s bug-eyed women who can’t stand not being in charge that accounts for things like this. It’s happening everywhere, and nobody has the courage to say no.
Item I Found the Outer Limits of My Pro-choice Beliefs
But here in Israel, abortion is widely available and can be offered until delivery.
Shhhh. Don’t tell evangelists.
To support this site and its wholly independent host using credit card or PayPal (in any amount) click here
“Fall Epstein-Clinton line.” Perfect. You dress little girls like sluts and then get the vapors when some guy bangs them. You’re using a mouse and the kid is the cheese. It’s torture of society, quite simply and very evil (the baiting—the sexual attraction to the kid is 100% natural and pure just like all other perversions are). As I have said repeatedly, you teach men women should be wrinkle-free, perfectly-shaped and innocent, the only thing that comes close is a 10-year-girl. Now, of course, you teach men to go for sex robots. Has anyone checked the dark net for sex robots that are 5 year children duplicates????
As for schools, IDIOT, UNCARING PARENTS are the cause of this. If parents HATE their kids that much, only God can fix society and it won’t be pretty. Think Sodom and Gomorrah on steroids. But hey, that’s what the uncaring, evil parents want for their kids…..
Actually, the Muslim/Sharia law takeover will accomplish what climate change has failed at—massive population decrease as millions are tossed off high places for worshipping perversion. Whether’s that moral or not is irrelevant. It’s REALITY and reality does not care what anyone thinks or what legislation they pass. One hopes the pervsion worshipping legislatures are made the first examples.
“the mother insists that this [girl’s] group is not of the same caliber as the historic boys’ institution”
TW’s Fact Check: True, but funny.
In The Netherlands we have the system that parents can start a school on whatever ideology they want, and the government has to fund that school in exactly the same way as public schools. So we have Roman Catholic schools, Protestant schools, Montessori schools, Dalton schools, etc etc etc, public schools and even some Islamic ones. And they all get the same amount of money per pupil.
The Left over here is quite keen on getting rid of the non-public schools as well, but they have a much harder time as lots of Leftist parents have their children on Montessori or other such schools, and those schools must go too in that system is abandoned.
From the “it will never lead to legalized pedophilia” files:
God is all-merciful.
But when it comes to traumatizing little children and teaching them and teen-agers, and all, that perversion is right, those pushing it will be called to answer for their works, and how terrible that will be.
Sadly, in the Catholic Church’s John Paul II Catechism of Vatican II, there is no hope given to the same sex attracted to be healed and freed “…from their condition…” and so freed to live the heterosexuality in which they were created:
“2358 The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. They do not choose their homosexual condition; for most of them it is a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God’s will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord’s Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.”
All people are to be treated according to God’s commandment “Love your neighbor as yourself.”
And so, even the Church leaves the same sex attracted without hope of living without same sex attraction, and gives no hope nor prayer nor does it put forth the use of the gifts of the Holy Spirit, given to each Bishop, to free people so attracted so that they can live the heterosexuality attraction which each person has been given by God.
God does not deny His Word. God did not create same sex attraction in any human being. Jesus “confirmed” God’s Word in Genesis, in Matthew. Both places say that God created us heterosexually male and female. Nowhere in the Bible is same sex attraction given honor as being created by God.
Wake up the Bishops to use their Holy Spirit gifts!! It is probable that the State will not approve of the freeing of people into true freedom, but Jesus certainly will. So Him or the State, it is time to choose.
God bless, C-Marie
“it is impossible two men can marry each other.”
“God is all-merciful.”
God can’t be merciful at all, let alone all-merciful. Mercy consists of withholding justified punishment, which God cannot do as his system of justice is perfect.
“God did not create same sex attraction in any human being.”
Yet people with same-sex attraction exist. Conclusion: God doesn’t exist.
Regarding: “God can’t be merciful at all, let alone all-merciful. Mercy consists of withholding justified punishment, which God cannot do as his system of justice is perfect.”
God is all-merciful. His Son, Jesus Christ, suffered the full, justified, punishment in God’s perfect system of justice, for God is all-just, for all of the sins human beings have and ever will have, committed. Our part is to receive Jesus as our Lord, our Saviour, our God.
Today, after receiving Jesus Christ in Holy Communion, I was thinking to Him about your response, and these words came to my heart: “I have loved you with an everlasting Love; therefore I draw you with my Lovingkindness.” For you.
And regarding: “Yet people with same-sex attraction exist. Conclusion: God doesn’t exist.”
People are human beings created in the image and likeness of God. In both Genesis and Matthew, this is wholly confirmed. Human beings are created heterosexual. Same sex attraction is a counterfeit attraction against God’s creation of heterosexuality.
An article that I read, said that the Catholic Church has never identified persons by their sexual appetites, nor reduced them to their sexual inclinations. The titles, “LGBTQ” and more, may be acceptable in describing issues, but not in describing people.
The gifts of the Holy Spirit were given to the Catholic Church, to be used by those to whom they were given. So, those Bishops and more, who have been given the gift of healing, must needs be courageous in the Holy Spirit, and exercise them, use them, for the good of all.
As St. James writes: “15If a brother or sister is without clothing and in need of daily food,16and one of you says to them, “Go in peace, be warmed and be filled,” and yet you do not give them what is necessary for their body, what use is that?”
James 2: 15-16.
So, the Catholic Catechism basically says there is nothing we can do for you who are same sex attracted…..so be chaste, carry your burden, suffer your “condition”, stay true to Christ…..but we have no clue as to what we, the Church hierarchy, can do to help you, let alone free you from this, counterfeit attraction, so that you can live in the truth of your God created sexuality, heterosexuality.
The parallel is self-evident. Where is the faith in Jesus Christ, the Healer, with such a catechetical response as above?
And St. Paul writes concerning the gifts given to the Church:
“1Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I do not want you to be unaware. 2You know that when you were pagans, you were led astray to the dumb idols, however you were led. 3Therefore I make known to you, that no one speaking by the Spirit of God says, “Jesus is accursed”; and no one can say, “Jesus is Lord,” except by the Holy Spirit.
4Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit. 5And there are varieties of ministries, and the same Lord. 6And there are varieties of effects, but the same God who works all things in all persons.
7But to each one is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good. 8For to one is given the word of wisdom through the Spirit, and to another the word of knowledge according to the same Spirit; 9to another faith by the same Spirit, and to another gifts of healing by the one Spirit, 10and to another the effecting of miracles, and to another prophecy, and to another the distinguishing of spirits, to another various kinds of tongues, and to another the interpretation of tongues.
11But one and the same Spirit works all these things, distributing to each one individually just as He wills.” 1 Corinthians 12: 1-11
Also you can see 1 Corinthians 12: 27-31.
God bless, C-Marie
“God is all-merciful. His Son, Jesus Christ, suffered the full, justified, punishment in God’s perfect system of justice, for God is all-just, for all of the sins human beings have and ever will have, committed.”
This kind of thing makes me despair. So many levels of wrong!
The entire idea that a human sacrifice is somehow going to make anything better is irrational. It’s really no different from ancient people sacrificing goats to try and stop a volcano from erupting. If God really wants to forgive everyone, why doesn’t he just do it, rather than having himself sacrificed to himself for no reason?
Crucifiction would be a very unpleasant death, but there are arguably worse ways to die (being trapped in a confined space and and unable to move is my pet fear. I’ve never heard of anyone saying that being crucified is their pet fear). It wasn’t even unusual at the time. In any case, Jesus could have made it so he was miraculously unable to suffer during it anyway. The idea that this was some kind of ultimate punishment is objectively false.
Jesus being punished on behalf of others doesn’t make sense. If someone murdered your child, how would it help if I offered to be punished instead of the actual murderer? That would just make things worse! In any case, if everyone is forgiven, then there is no justice at all.
Forgiveness shouldn’t have strings attached otherwise it isn’t true forgiveness anyway. Going back to the child murder example, if my child was murdered, the murderer could ‘repent’ and end up in Heaven, while I, as an atheist, would end up in Hell.
I’ve probably left something out. Oh yes, the ‘sins’ for which we apparently require forgiveness are often only sins because God has labelled tham as such in the first place. Forgiving someone for doing something wrong which isn’t immoral under any rational system of morality is itself pointless.
“Human beings are created heterosexual.”
Human beings aren’t created, they’re born.
If one, as an atheist, fully wills to not receive the only sacrifice which took away the punishment for all sin, then that one is in a perilous state of life for certain. Everyone is forgiven, but that forgiveness must be received through the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ.
The difficulty with the “rational system of morality”” is that if it is only set-up with human wisdom and not Godliness, it most often will not measure up to God’s standard. And since He created us, it is His choice to set the standards by which, as necessary, sinful conduct is determined and also its seriousness.
I guess the only thing left to be said here, are the words which Jesus Christ spoke to Nicodemus when he came to Jesus with questions….perhaps somewhat like yours…
Here is a portion of Gospel which the Apostle John wrote, in Jesus’ own words, which words explain who Jesus is and why He came, and that He alone could undergo all of the punishment due to what God has determined are sins.
“16 For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.
17 For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him.
18 He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
19 This is the judgment, that the Light has come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the Light, for their deeds were evil.
20 For everyone who does evil hates the Light, and does not come to the Light for fear that his deeds will be exposed.
21 But he who practices the truth comes to the Light, so that his deeds may be manifested as having been wrought in God.”
So, choose Jesus as your Lord and Saviour and God. He loves you, dearly and perfectly.
God bless, C-Marie
“Everyone is forgiven, but that forgiveness must be received through the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ.”
Again, if we’re forgiven, why do we have to jump through hoops to claim this forgiveness? It’s like a Nigerian scam where you’re promised a million dollars if you just pay a thousand dollar admin fee.
“The difficulty with the “rational system of morality”” is that if it is only set-up with human wisdom and not Godliness, it most often will not measure up to God’s standard.”
God’s standard of morality includes condoning slavery, and ordering rape and genocide. If you think these are wrong, you’ve already got higher standards of morality than God. God’s moral standard is primitive, unbalanced, and irrational, exactly in accordance with the standards of society at the time when the Bible was written.
“So, choose Jesus as your Lord and Saviour and God. He loves you, dearly and perfectly.”
Jesus obviously doesn’t love me otherwise he wouldn’t be condemning me to hell unless I believe in him based on weak evidence. A genuinely loving God wouldn’t set belief in him as a requirement for being saved – he would simply save everyone. That’s what I’d do, anyway, so either God doesn’t exist, or I can think up a better idea than God without even trying.
Leaving this conversation now. I have offered all that there is.
You and God will figure this out together.
God bless, C-Marie
“God did not create same sex attraction in any human being.”
Yet people with same-sex attraction exist. Conclusion: God doesn’t exist.
Or . . . or:
Conclusion: People with ssa foist it on themselves for any variety of reasons.
@ c matt,
“Conclusion: People with ssa foist it on themselves for any variety of reasons.”
That must be it! People who are _really_ attracted to the opposite sex just (somehow) decide to be attracted to the same sex instead, so they can suffer homophobic abuse, risk being physically assaulted, and generally make their lives much more difficult. For reasons.
The notion that God “had to die” is calvanism.
The so called substitutionary principle of the atonement.
@ One Ment with God.
It’s obviously wrong.
The only way it makes sense is to consider that given a Christian believes that Jesus’s birth and Death and ressurection are key in our understanding of our salvation, it must be because of our sin that he was killed and that is was inevitable. That if God exists he should have made himself known to us in some way at some time or times and for all time.
Otherwise it appears like a homoerotic nightmare stroy.
That paul explains that sacrifice is not necessary as was being carried out by the Jews and by mankind to God or the Gods before was WRONG.
That God does not require that of us. That we are loved, there is hope, and the only reason I believe it all over again having almost given it up is due to personal revelation that then lead me back to read the gospels again. I don’t interpret them for my own convenience as so many cfeepy cathokics imply but because of what I am capable of belieiving.
The story in the Gospel does not make sense except to be one of hope, and to inspire.
Christianity cannot if it is true conflict with science or reality. It has to make sense.
Even when I was confirmed it never really made sense. It was all happening around me and I simply believed in the same way as I did as a child. All the chat never made sense even though everybody repeated so much of it. I wasn’t able to articulate what I was really thinking.
The idea of taking pride in your faith is absurd and prverse. Yet the Welshman boasts this is so. Everybody understands that humility is a good thing and pride is not. Atheists think the same, commonly.
Faith does not take great effort, you either believe it or you do not. No coersion, bullying, sarcasm, satire fake dichotomies, sleight of hand, fudging of history and lying for the team can change what someone believes.
There is no hell.
There is hellishness.
Hell is a human invention.
Even though God exists.
Regarding the substitionary sacrifice of Jesus Christ, the only Begotten Son of God, taking our place….which if He had not done so, we would have been separated from God forever, but instead of being separated:
God sent His only begotten Son because He, God, so loved the world.
In the book of Genesis is related the first sin which was ever committed by human beings. The sin was the most serious because they knew what they were doing, and it broke the relationship of God’s beloved creation with Himself. Adam and Eve knew that God had forbidden such an action, but they did it anyway, by the temptation of the enemy, because they desired to be like God in the knowing of good and evil.
First, the woman, Eve, ate of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, and then she gave it to her husband, Adam, who was right there with her, to eat of the same.
After this, God called to Adam and said “Where are you?” The man responded that he had hid himself because he was naked. God asked, as to who told him that he was naked and also asks if he had eaten of the fruit of the tree I commanded you to not eat?
Of course God knew the answer, but we are to confess our sins from our own heart.
Adam immediately blamed his wife, and even said as a way, perhaps, of blaming God, that it was God Who gave Eve to him, and that it was all her fault for tempting him.
Then God said to the woman, what is this you have done, and she blamed the sepent for deceiving her.
Then God laid out the punishment for this sin, the Original Sin, and so with this break in human beings relationship with God, came the absolute necessity of restoring the relationship.
All of this is in Genesis Chapter 3.
The problem was that since the results of this sin covered all of mankind, and only a sinless person could restore the relationship with God, it became incumbent upon God to give the solution and to be the solution in some way, which solution was that only someone who was sinless would be able to suffer the complete punishment of death, and rise alive, and thus wipe out all of the effects of sin and its punishment.
Since all of mankind was and is under the sin nature of the first Adam, there had to be a new creation of mankind. The only way this could be was if God Himself created a full sinless human nature for Himself, came to earth, lived, taught, suffered, died utterly encompassing all of death, and arose from the grave to live forever, thus having wiped out all of the punishment due to every sin, ever, which full punishment was eternal death, utter separation from God. Jesus is the last Adam.
“For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. 17“For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him.” John 3: 16.
How does that work for us? We must partake in Christ’s Sacrifice in and through and with full acceptance of the sinless One, Jesus Christ, Who suffered that death and arose, as our Lord, Saviour, and God. God also sends the Holy Spirit to fill us who believe, literally, so that He can continue growing mighty faith in us who believe.
Because we attempt to reason through all of this, we often fall short because God Is Love and we fall so short of understanding and believing that utterly unselfish love can even exist. If we choose to believe, God will give us the faith to know, love, and serve Him and to remain steady, but we must do our part, daily in prayer, continuing to build relationship with Him.
Those who with the full strength of their will, wholly reject Jesus, will suffer eternity without Him. Jesus spoke clearly of Hell and its reality when He was here, bodily, in the earth. It is real.
We entrust to God all of our loved ones, praying daily for each one to be His before they die.
God bless, C-Marie
The substitutionary idea of the atonement is Calvinism.
Catholics do not believe this, or if they beliege in the ‘one true faith ‘, they shouldn’t.
Augustine described it as perverse and obscene.
Augustine believed in original sin.
I think it is an extremely obvious thing to notice when reading only four chapters of genesis. The what I’m calling multiplying effect of sin. Plays and stories have been written on the theme, no reference to the bible.
It is allegory in my view.
That everybody is a sinner in the state of human imperfection to an ideal is something nobody would argue about much.
We do not in any way carry a burdon of guilt from anyone else’s sin nbor did God’s son carry a burdon of guilt for anything mankind did.
He carried blame and suffered BECAUSE of the sin of mankind. VEry simple and important distinction which takes all the mysticism out of the curcifixion.
The only mystery is about the ressurection.
Correction and clarification of who said what about substitutionary theory of atonement.
Substitutional theory is Calvin’s invocation from16th century.
st. Anselm of Cantebury said that the substitutionary theory was “immoral and depraved” having considered it as a possible interpretation.
I said it was obscene and perverse, I would add unjust.
“God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son…” is how it is eroneously read into the Bible.
C-M: The problem was that since the results of this sin covered all of mankind, and only a sinless person could restore the relationship with God, it became incumbent upon God to give the solution and to be the solution in some way, which solution was that only someone who was sinless would be able to suffer the complete punishment of death, and rise alive, and thus wipe out all of the effects of sin and its punishment.
Joy: The substitutionary idea of the atonement is Calvinism.
C-M: Here is the wording from the Catholic Catechism:
604 By giving up his own Son for our sins, God manifests that his plan for us is one of benevolent love, prior to any merit on our part: “In this is love, not that we loved God but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the expiation for our sins.”408 God “shows his love for us in that while we were yet sinners Christ died for us.”409”
C-M: So Jesus was not punished by God, as penal substitution might suggest depending on definitions of words, but He did suffer our punishment to the fullest, made full satisfaction for us, and did so in the fullness of loving His Father and us.
God bless, C-Marie
I don’t have time for discussion.
As I stated, the catholic faith of the latin tradition believes/teaches original sin. Augustine is of that tradition.
Greek, Rusian orthodox and others do not believe in original sin. Neither do I as you are descriving it.
My point was clear enough. I fully realise what the claim of original sin is about. You seem to think I don’t know and are simply repeating an asertion about it.
My source is from Kieth Ward who is a preist of the Church of England, and previouslyt Regis professor of divinity, also andexpert on world religions outside of the Christian faith.
Where I agree with you, I’ve said it before many times in other posts, where I disagree is obvious and is in my comment.
I’m not a Catholic so you’re wasting your time. I am more likely to become mormon than Catholic at this stage and that’s not likely.
I understand now, Joy. God bless, C-Marie