Culture

If You Can’t Say It’s Bad, Then Those Who Say It’s Good Win

A choir in—where else?—San Francisco has released (but then pulled?) a song singing “we’re coming for your children“. Some lyrics (quoting from the source):

We’ll convert your children — happens bit by bit, quietly and subtly and you will barely notice it… We’ll convert your children: we’ll make them tolerant and fair.

We’ll convert your children — Yes we will! — reaching one and all, there’s really no escaping it, cause even grandma likes RuPaul. We’ll convert your children: someone’s gotta teach them not to hate!

We’re coming for them, we’re coming for your children! We’re coming for them, we’re coming for them, WE’RE COMING FOR YOUR CHILDREN!!!

Your children will care about fairness and justice for others! Your children will work to convert all their sisters and brothers! Then soon we’re almost certain, your kids will start converting you! The gay agenda is coming home!

First, we must commend honesty wherever we find it, as we do here. People who enjoy sodomy are now admitting their preferred recruiting technique. They used to scream “Homophobe!” when reminded of how they go after children. Now they celebrate it. This is progress.

Second, the group’s desires are, society says, fine. If we say, as most do say, that sodomy is acceptable, then there is nothing wrong with telling our children this. You can say to a kid, “You should, when you come of age, give sodomy a chance. You might like it. Even take Pride in it.”

There is no more reason to forbid or criticize this than to forbid a married couple admitting to children they are expecting a baby. With all that that implies. Having a man who enjoys sodomy tell the kiddies how he got oral herpes is not only reasonable, but rational for the obvious reasons. Accepting the premise that sodomy is a good, that is.

The inability to say, aloud and in public, that sodomy is bad means that we must be ruled by those that say it is good.

This applies everywhere.

Seven years ago, I brought you the news that “Denmark already has a handful of animal brothels which, according to Ice News, a site specialized in Nordic reporting, charge between $85 and $170 depending on the animal of choice.”

I said (and have often repeated), “It’s little known, but bestiality is legal is several countries, mostly in Europe.” And I asked, “What to call these folks? Zoophilia is the technical term for the desire, but ‘zoophiliacs’ is unwieldy. How about woofies? That has a pleasant, nonjudgemental, evocative tone.”

Woofieism is, therefore, yet another sexual “orientation.” Today, in mid 2021, I believe the majority would still aloud and in public say buggering goats is evil. But I allow I might be wrong about this, especially given this headline: “Disgusting perverts or just misunderstood? Meet the zoophiles who have sex with animals and want to be embraced by Pride“.

Zoophiles believe it’s acceptable to be intimate with an animal, and want the LGTBQ+ movement to add a Z to its name. RT spoke to one about their secret world, and with members of the ‘furry’ and ‘therian’ communities.

Perhaps furry is superior to woofie, as is “zoopride”: I admit defeat. It leads to things like this:

This is only one of many, a set that is only increasing. Because, as should now be clear, the inability of our Experts and rulers to say that goatsects is wrong, immoral, and evil. They read things like the following, and their minds, saturated in Equality, succumb:

People think our relationships with animals are exclusively sexual, but just like heterosexuality and homosexuality, our relationships are multifaceted. Sex is a very small part of our interactions with animals, and in fact, there are many zoophiles who don’t have sex with animals at all. I think a defining part of our existence is a profound respect for non-human people, and a desire to make the world a better place for them.

This is why many zoophiles spend time engaged in animal rights activism and orient their lives around working with animals. We love them, and we want to enrich their lives.

It’s the same with those who enjoy sodomy. It’s not like they are at it at all hours of the day. Indeed, only minutes, a small and insignificant proportion of their lives. Why fixate on so trivial a pursuit?

Of course, the murderer could say it only took a second to pull the trigger, and, after all, this is the only person he killed, so why make a thing about it?

Subscribe or donate to support this site and its wholly independent host using credit card or PayPal click here

Categories: Culture

47 replies »

  1. If you can’t say it’s bad, then those who say it’s good win by forfeiture. A forfeit IS a loss on BOTH sides and we need to say that a lot while we can. Winning only occurs if the game is played. Shutting out the opponent is NOT winning.

    San Francisco is a hellmouth. That should be obvious and it’s a totally lost cause. They can all celebrate eternity in Hell together.

    LAZY PARENTS. Stupid, apathetic, lazy parents. The root of all evil that grows. Americans HATE their children and are sending them straight to hell. They gave permission to ruin the child they despise and hate.

    Society says NONE of this. Rich, evil and horrible people do and everyone else keeps their mouth shut while staying in the evil on social media. Love of attention and inability to drop Zuckerberg are what is sending America to hell and they just won’t get off the path. So in that sense, society is too weak not to go straight to hell.

    (Yes, I come from the state that made the first George Floyd out of a gay kid that cheated his drug dealers. Promoters of gayhood were out of staters and Wyomingites are idiots. Sorry, we may be a little state, but we are desperately lonely and stupid and dying for attention and will do ANYTHING.)

    Wyoming just outlawed beastiality so it should change back soon as the unpopularness of the idea becomes apparent. It was just a mistake to make a rancher happy and will corrected.

    Pedophilia is for all purposes legal now, as children are deemed sexual and as Democrats becomes dictators. Democrats LOVVVVVE children. They have a plane to a pedo island. Watch President What’s His Name and how he zeroes in on little girls and the comments he makes while sniffing hair and chewing on fingers. Look at the human trafficking the Dems so love with an open border. Rape, torture, child porno all at their fingertips and growing. No need for a law change. Any laws are completely ignored now and the behaviour is encouraged by our supreme leader.

  2. They say “We’ll convert your children”. Does this mean that they admit that homosexuality is a missionary religion?

    A government sponsored missionary religion? Please notice the banner at the bottom.
    https://archive.is/71SuO

    Would a Christian be allowed to put up a banner on the grounds of a state capitol saying “All people should be baptised”?

    When do we get a wall of separation between sexuality and state?

  3. There is an animal rescue organization in the District of Columbia (AKA Mordor on the Potomac) which deals exclusively with healing and rehabilitating dogs which have been serially sexually abused. They have subchapters which specialize in different breeds. They stay busy, receiving about a dog per day.

    The perverts greatly prefer to abuse male dogs, by the way.

  4. Is it just a weird coincidence the DC metro area (Mordor on the Potomac) has by far (by almost triple the #2 ranked) the highest incidence of lost and missing children in the nation?

  5. LGTBQZ+

    Why not? I am all for it. The more they add, the more absurd they get. Regular people’s cognitive dissonance will increase and it can’t be increasing forever. This will keep going until it ends with a big bang.

  6. My first reaction to the video was thinking that I should instigate a conversation between the lead singer’s face and a ball bat.

    Not very Christian-like, I know…but there it is.

  7. People who enjoy sodomy are now admitting their preferred recruiting technique. They used to scream “Homophobe!” when reminded of how they go after children. Now they celebrate it. This is progress.

    Sigh. Where to even start.

    1. Fallacy of hasty generalisation (on multiple levels). The lyrics of one song do not represent the opinion of all gay people, any more than the Westborough Baptist Church represents all Christians – although to be fair, there’s not much difference between their homophobia and yours.

    2. Pot, kettle, black. Religion depends almost entirely on indoctrinating children. Without the abilty to do so, it would be gone in a generation. If you don’t like the idea of indoctrinating children, stop doing it. And let’s not forget that there are many horrendous passages in the Bible which shouldn’t be taught to children.

    3. Unlike religion, gay people do not need to recruit. Some people are born gay. This has always been true, even going back to biblical times.

    4. Regarding “sodomy”, many gay people do not engage in anal sex, but almost all straight people engage in oral sex.

    Woofieism is, therefore, yet another sexual “orientation.”

    Unlikely. But why mention it anyway? It’s got nothing to do with gay people. I might as well link “Amazing Grace” with islamic terrorism on the grounds that they both have something to do with Abrahamic religion.

    It’s the same with those who enjoy sodomy. It’s not like they are at it at all hours of the day. Indeed, only minutes, a small and insignificant proportion of their lives. Why fixate on so trivial a pursuit?

    Indeed. Why are you so totally obsessed with it?

  8. The preparations for the 2012 World Cup Final in Munich included government-sponsored (German) prostitution trafficking (importing east European prostitutes to ensure a happy ending for the male/gay/pedo fans). This confirmed my opinion Europeans lived in a moral sewer.

  9. I have no problem with others people sexual preferences as long as they leave me alone. However I have a big problem (and therefore they as well!) with ideological activists of the Pol Pot mindset variety. And their numbers seem proliferating nowadays

  10. The way I look at it is, sin is sin. Sin is personal sin until gov get involved and causes the whole nation to support it. Sin is personal, one person until gov says taxes will pay for sex changes of military. Free sex changes, all you need to do is enter the military. Feminize our military and much easier to defeat. I think it was the brother of the raped Dinah, had all the men circumsized and while they were recovering took advantage of their pain and slaughtered them. Our nation is suffering and our present prez wants to incapacitate us all.

  11. I was wondering who’d get here first to spin this in sodomy’s favour – atheist Swordfizh or Anglican Joy?

    Sigh, where to start? Oh, in order of excuses given –

    1. But but… not ALL gays!
    – That’s little comfort. Mainstream gays, like our happy choir boys over here are ALL for it! They are only admitting to what is already going on. Or is sillyfish trying to claim that somehow a group as large and “diverse” in membership as the gay men’s choir is not a representative sample of gaydom? But let’s give it to fishchips, it’s true that not all gays are into pedophilia. But those turn out to be a minority, who are then intimidated and shouted down as Judases to the cause by mainstream corporate gaydom. A disproportionate number if gays are into underaged sex, because a disproportionate number of them are themselves victims who’d been ‘turned’ while underaged by an older tolerant individual. Just look at all the recent lawsuits filed against the woke boy scouts. Swordtits doesn’t like the statistics, so he’s trying to pull a fast one, and is hoping to save Sodom by appealing to God like Abraham did by begging for mercy for the few. But the fact remains that this song was put out in public as part of the true ongoing goal of the gaydom of dog, and bit by bit with every apologetical article and TEDX talk and marxist classroom lesson that momentum and support is growing, and someday, swordfish here will turn from a useful idiot into a full blown ally!

    2. Potty Kettle look at the false equivalencies I’m making as I flail my arms!
    – Stupidfish doesn’t realize that ALL education is indoctrination. So because mother is telling children to wash their hands before eating, and teacher is telling children that 2×2 is always 4, and Fr. Strict is teaching children that they are made in the image of God, that THEREFORE (spit-splutter-fish) it is PEERRFECTLY OKAY for gaydom to teach children to fist each others assholes! You heard swordFist! Step right up ladies and gentlemen! The intellectual sophistry of the atheist Swordfish! Oh but, please note that swordfish is not representative of ALL atheists. You know, the ones who cast off religion so they could actively hunts aboriginal and natives and negros and add their skulls as lesser human but advanced apes to their museum artifact collections and tell us how evolved and superior the white man is! That’s also perfectly okay to indoctrinate to your kids with! Trust THE SCIENCE ™!

    3. I was born this way!
    – BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! TRUST DA SCIENCE OF NEUROPLASTICITY! Or ignorance of it. Well, let’s play along. Swordborn, if gays are born dat way. Then why not pedophiles? Or woofies? What? You think anyone just wakes up in the morning and decided,”You know what? I think I’m going to just be sexually attracted to the same sex and/or kids/animals beginning today”? As I said, swordwoof will either abandon gaydom or he’ll have to expand the alphabet to include the kid-screwers and doggy-doers. Then again, one should not underestimate double-think. Because the point is not the point. Muh atheism is!

    4. Straights do things too!
    – Did you know that 99.9999999999% of activities that gay and straight people do, good and bad, is THE SAME!!!!!!! They both eat food! They both go potty! They both watch movies! They both pirate videogames! They are also both know for breaking the 10 Commandments! Wow! It’s almost as if they are both human beings or something! And at the end if the day, I’m pretty certain that pedophiles and woofies also do 99% of the same things! So pedophilia and beastiality are therefore a-okay and should be tolerated to some extent! D’ohfish rests his case!

    So stop being totally obsessed with woofies and pedophiles! Ignore them you crazy religious people! Pedophiles use the internet just like swordfish and both like to tell religious people to get lost and like OMG stop obsessing over things! SAME THING! So they are both linked together intimately!

    Ergo, swordfish, by persuasion of his own arguments is the dame as a gay pedophile dog lover. And you can expect his song and dance routine over this in the next thread.

  12. “Regarding “sodomy”, many gay people do not engage in anal sex, but almost all straight people engage in oral sex.” ~ swordfishwhatever

    Really curious about your documentation on that. I’d say you pulled it straight out of where the sun don’t shine.

  13. “almost all straight people engage in oral sex”.

    This is terrible news. It is well known that anal sex causes cancer, but fewer people know that oral sex causes cancer. (ask your dentist). Perhaps in addition to questions about tobacco use, medical insurance enrollment should ask about anal & oral sex? The combination leads to horrific gastrointestinal diseases & attempts to treat chronic cases led to antibiotic resistant disease outbreaks that had public health officials terrified in San Francisco in 2006 & Melbourne a couple of years ago.

    Might as well throw in weight over 300lbs & recreational drug use while we are at it…

  14. Jerry,

    Really curious about your documentation on that. I’d say you pulled it straight out of where the sun don’t shine.

    About 50% of gay people are lesbians and they don’t generally engage in anal sex. It’s fairly common for gay men not to have anal sex, but not the sort of thing you can find much research on to cite. If you’re interested, just google it, and you’ll find articles where gay men cite their experience on this.

    What makes someone gay isn’t what sort of sex they have (especially as straight people can have anal sex), it’s what people you fall in love with and form relationships with.

  15. ”The inability to say, aloud and in public, that sodomy is bad means that we must be ruled by those that say it is good.

    That’s the way it is. Either they go back in the closet, or they stick their poxy swordfish dicks in our children. Not a toughie.

  16. Swordfish,
    I know you are a happily married man and with a family.
    I’m sorry you had to have some of the BS which was metered out to others in the past
    Merely for refusing to give way to hate displays or recently, love displays regarding God, on cue by bloggers and commenters.

    I hope you enjoy the football on Sunday and the new “out out” that we’re going to be allowed to do.

  17. Dean Ericson,

    Your comments using my name are despicable. You are a terrible advertisment for your religion. And the story you cite about a male attempting to snatch a female child has nothing whatsoever to do with gay people, so you couldn’t even get that right.

    All this over a satirical song!

  18. So I did a bit of research and it turns out that the song is meant to be a joke, a piece of satire deliberately designed to make fun of people like Briggs who have taken it seriously. So I didn’t need to defend it after all, although my previous comments about fallacies and so on still stand.

  19. Of course sodomites are attracted to barely adolescent males and they try to have access to them and to groom them and make them their catamites.

    At “Gay Pride” Parades NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association) used to proudly march

    That this is becoming ever more public and pronounced is no surprise as evil is celebrated as a good when Faith begins to corrupt and perish.

    Even the original chosen people had began to worship the Penis as an idol.

    “Moreover he also removed his mother Maacha, from being the princess in the sacrifices of Priapus, and in the grove which she had consecrated to him: and he destroyed her den, and broke in pieces the filthy idol, and burnt it by the torrent Cedron:”
    [3 Kings (1 Kings) 15:13]

    “Moreover Maacha the mother of king Asa he deposed from the royal authority, because she had made in a grove an idol of Priapus: and he entirely destroyed it, and breaking it into pieces, burnt it at the torrent Cedron.”
    [2 Paralipomenon (2 Chronicles) 15:16]

  20. So Swordman’s final defence of the indefensible is the typical politician’s tomfoolery –

    “Fellas! I was jus’ jokin!”

    Even if every lyric in the song is completely true! We intended it to be funny! C’mon guys! Hahaha! Hahaha! You’re taking this the wrong way!

    And ah yes, another scripted defence 101 from the ally’s playbook –

    NOT ALL GAYS PUT THINGS IN THE MOUTH OR THE BUM!

    That’s pretty funny considering all the funding and literature out there about –
    – How to put things in the bum safely.
    – How to put things in the mouth safely.
    – How to safely enjoy scat play.
    – A safe guide to rimming, tonguing, plugging etc.
    – C’mon straight boys and girls, you can do it too! Education campaigns, magazine articles and pamphlets. But SAFELY!!!

    So do not worry! It’s all about love!

    Even though statistically the majority of gays are promiscuous, and “marriages” fail at a rate that makes Elizabeth Taylor blush, and ESPECIALLY given that the initial gay movement was NEVER about marriage or fidelity – which were to them just as outdated as every other morality Joyful Anglicans reject in the Bible which was only for breeders who had to worry about pregnancy and children, which their superior homosexual selves were unshackled from. They wanted to completely reform society around their degenerate lifestyles in a brave new world!

    But just like initial feminism, and CRT, they realized very quickly, much like our gay choir-folk, that their ideas would be completely shocking if not laughable to normal people. So they had to dress up and transition the movement into a more dignified sort and play by the system – arguing for inventing new rights because ‘LUV IS LUV’ and ‘TOLERANCE’ and ‘SOCIALISM’ and ‘POVERTY’ and ‘BOO-HOO VICTIMHOOD’!

    Swordput is blissfully unaware of any of this. He’s never talked to gays. He’s never bothered to do any research. He’s never watched them become depressed over rectal issues, and the AIDS caused NOT by Fauci’s HIV, but frequent drug use and stimulants that help make all that taking it up the ass less painful. He doesn’t know about the bathhouse culture. He doesn’t even read their own published gay literature. Only days ago he was telling us how unrealistic the story of gays attacking Lot was! Perhaps he should look up the recent story of mobs of his allies at WI Spa for the sake of the trannies. What’s changed?

    But just like all those THE SCIENTISTS who dismissed Wuhan lab connections just because THE HATEFUL ONE who was President said it. Sworddope HATES principled religious people, so by default he switches on and out pour the slogans he has been dutifully taught as an ally of gaydom.

    Pray for his kids if he has any. The poor tykes are vulnerable under his watch. But for the deluded, THE LOVE ™, like THE SCIENCE ™ must dictate his actions! For a guy now playing along with the media script to say ‘it’s a joke, sheersh!’, notice how neither he nor Joyless can take a joke on their previous selves here! HOW DARE YOU! YOU… YOU… UNCHRISTIAN FELLOW! We came in here riding on our high horses and we demand your compliance and acquiesance to OUR FEEEEEELLLLLINGS, because as you well know we have nothing of substance to offer…

    Remember, they are defending gaydom, not because they actually care about gays. It’s to defend their own personal screwy religions, which happen to own some stock in the gay movement which they intend to support to destroy yours!

  21. Johnno,

    A disproportionate number if gays are into underaged sex, because a disproportionate number of them are themselves victims who’d been ‘turned’ while underaged by an older tolerant individual.

    Citation needed. Research shows that gay people are no more likely to be paedophiles than straight people are. (And probably a lot less likely than Catholic Priests. HA HA HA)

    Stupidfish doesn’t realize that ALL education is indoctrination.

    Wrong. Indoctrination is teaching people to accept something uncritically. And what is your argument here anyway – that indoctrination is okay? In that case, you’ve undermined Briggs’s claim that indoctrination of children about gay people is a bad thing. Not that it happens anyway.

    So because mother is telling children to wash their hands before eating

    Not really relevant, but Jesus told his disciples *not* to wash their hands before eating, so this mother should probably be burnt at the stake for heresy or something.

    You know, the ones who cast off religion so they could actively hunts aboriginal and natives and negros and add their skulls as lesser human but advanced apes to their museum artifact collections and tell us how evolved and superior the white man is!

    I think you need professional help.

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! TRUST DA SCIENCE OF NEUROPLASTICITY!

    Definitely professional help.

  22. Marlin Trumpet:

    “ Dean Ericson,

    Your comments using my name are despicable. You are a terrible advertisment for your religion. And the story you cite about a male attempting to snatch a female child has nothing whatsoever to do with gay people, so you couldn’t even get that right.

    All this over a satirical song!”

    I was being satirical, Marlin, relax. Had a friend in the nineties, married, two kids, came out as “gay”, he was recounting to me and my girlfriend at the time – yeah, I was a damned fornicator – his compulsive efforts in seducing young men. He couldn’t control it and knew it was a problem. That problem is not confined to homos. “Normal” people couldn’t control it either and jumped in with both feet to sex revolt in the form of free nookie, divorce, abortion, fornication, contraception, with result ruined families and messed up children and undermining of civilization foundation – strong family. Not all blame belongs on homo shoulders. But disordered fscking is civilizational solvent, and all men of goodwill should oppose it, wherever, and however, it manifests.

  23. [quote]Swishfish: “Citation needed.”[/quote]

    “…a study published in the left-leaning Archives of Sexual Behavior of over 200 convicted pedophiles and pederasts. It found that “86 percent of offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.” This demonstrates, as notes Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council, that “homosexual or bisexual men are approximately 10 times more likely to molest children than heterosexual men.”

    This makes perfect sense when coupled with another 2001 study in the same peer-reviewed publication. It found that nearly half of all “gay”-identified men who participated in research were molested by a homosexual pedophile as boys: “46 percent of homosexual men and 22 percent of homosexual women reported having been molested by a person of the same gender. This contrasts to only 7 percent of heterosexual men and 1 percent of heterosexual women reporting having been molested by a person of the same gender.”

    The connection between homosexual abuse and “gay identity” is undeniable. Although clearly not all “gay”-identified men and women abuse children, or were abused as children, the verifiable reality is that an alarmingly high percentage of them do and were. As with most forms of abuse, the cycle is both circular and vicious. “Born that way?” Not so much. “Made that way?” Sadly, it appears so.

    But of equal concern is the fact that many of the most prominent “LGBT” activists across the globe have either overtly endorsed, or given their implicit approval of, what the left euphemistically calls “intergenerational intimacy” (read: child rape).

    Take “marriage equality” activist Peter Tatchell, for instance. The GLAAD-affiliated blog “GoodAsYou” glowingly describes Tatchell as a “noted British rights activist.” He’s “one of the most widely respected leaders of the international LGBT movement” one of the blog’s commenters gushes.

    Here’s what “widely respected” and “noted rights activist” Tatchell thinks of child rape. He wrote the following in The Guardian, one of the U.K.’s premier newspapers:

    “The positive nature of some child-adult sexual relationships is not confined to non-Western cultures. Several of my friends – gay and straight, male and female – had sex with adults from the ages of nine to 13. None feel they were abused. … It is time society acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted, abusive and harmful.””

    More here:
    https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/the-homosexual-movements-push-for-adult-child-sex

    Also, thank you for acknowledging that the Catholic Church abuse was largely homosexual! Although the majority of the ones the homo-priests could get their hands in were older boys past puberty, usually through the Seminary system, but was overwhelmingly a male on male phenomenon. But we should thank God for the little things.

    [quote]what is your argument here anyway – that indoctrination is okay?[/quote]

    Yes! It is PERFECTLY FINE to indoctrinate people with things that are correct, moral and true, like 2 + 2 equals four, and you don’t need a philosophy degree or major in mathematics to understand why, or to wash your hands as a habit without a comprehensive understanding of germ theory, or that thou shalt not covet another man’s wife without the details that involve lustful sexual intercourse. We do this to all the time and many don’t care to completely understand what they ate receiving.

    Indoctrination is VERY BAD when it is promoting things that are untruthful, immoral, and dangerous, especially when hiding all the finer details and complexities that would ruin its case. Like ‘Homosexuality is just LURV’ ‘Whites are oppressors’ and ‘2 + 2 must always be 4 is false and a system that denies consideration of other points of view and is therefore discriminatory.’

    Indoctrination and Discrimination are very useful when aimed towards the right things. This is why we tell children – don’t go off with strangers and be wary of someone you don’t know, especially if they are dressing in opposite clothes. They don’t need to know the finer details. But don’t worry, its not like we’re hiding the facts from them. When they’re older and more exposed to the rot of the world, we’ll gladly accomodate them with more info.

    Now, given the rest of your replies are either stupid comparisons looking for straw with which to fashion a man that you might alight had you a spark of intelligence, denial of factual historical atrocities such as what white evolutionary racist scientists did to native and aboriginal peoples they considered less evolved humans, and denial of the awkward facts that demonstrate that brain patterns usually fashion themselves according to behaviour which is why it is not evidence of any ‘born-that-way’ theory, which is why recent polls are demonstrating that more and more young badly-indoctrinated youth are increasingly identifying as unique members of the sex-alphabets in numbers that suggest the complete opposite of any genetic explanation and more a result of societal upbringing, it seems that you have not been able to make any case for sodomy here other than to repeat long-debunked slogans that you have been indoctrinated to say.

    Here’s how I’ll know if you’re really committed to actually caring about gay people. Since you admit that anal intercourse is bad and cite that some homosexuals do not engage with it. Are you – swordfishtrombone – willing to therefore preach to the gays that do engage in this behaviour to stop and to support people involved in awareness of the problems associated with it and to fight against those pushing “safe” anal sex as “a-okay” in education materials, and pride parades and media seeking to normalize it alongsude scat fetishes?

    Yes, or no?

  24. Not all blame belongs on homo shoulders. But disordered fscking is civilizational solvent, and all men of goodwill should oppose it, wherever, and however, it manifests.

    As Dean well points out, it is true that the problem of society’s downward spiral didn’t begin withs homosexuals.

    Once hetero-normies created contraception to separate procreation from sex and reduce it to “feels good man” and a natural drug stimulant, there was no reason to oppose homosexual acts. Much the same for the sanctity of marriage, thanks in large part to Joy’s Anglicanism, for now adultery and divorce by government bureaucrat fiat were very convenient – even a HOOMAN RIGHT!!!! So why can’t homosexuals also get a printable certificate that’s just as legally binding as a one night stand?

    The road to the LGBWTFBBQ wasn’t built in a day!

    This is why we must also take down Anglicanism, though it helps that they are steadily demolishing themselves one progressive step at a time!

  25. Reproductive biology and sexuality need to be fully disentangled in public education. Children rightfully require some instruction concerning those matters and processes which help to explain human origin and existence. This knowledge serves early life existential yearnings and also opens gateways to other life science learning. However, what these S.F. GleeClubSingers (a self-titled Choir Group) advocate in song is for exposing school age children to their Homosexual Kama Sutra Coloring Books on school library shelves. The false equivalency could not be more plain. Claims that pornographic (erotic) instruction are critical and necessary (helpful) to engendering broader social tolerance ~ and that children have no rights to be protected against such Cultural Marxist propaganda (even by their parents) ~ will only result in a razor wire social schism. As Napoleon discovered in 1812 – a forced retreat can be more far disastrous than any loss on a battlefield – in every way.

  26. Johnno,

    a study published in the left-leaning Archives of Sexual Behavior of over 200 convicted pedophiles and pederasts. It found that “86 percent of offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.” This demonstrates, as notes Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council, that “homosexual or bisexual men are approximately 10 times more likely to molest children than heterosexual men.”

    You complain about the politics of the peer reviewed Archives of Sexual Behavior, then cite the Family Research Council, an extremist right-wing Christian joke of an organisation? It’s extremely unlikely that the (unqualified) Sprigg is accurately reporting the findings of the AoSB paper, but I can’t identify it from just “a study” in order to check it.

    Anyway, Sprigg is wrong. Paedophiles are attracted to children, not adults. If an adult male molests a female child, that is an example of child molestation, not hererosexuality, and likewise, if an adult male molests a male child, that is an example of child molestation, not homosexuality. Few paedophiles are attracted to adults of either sex.

    Are homosexual adults in general sexually attracted to children, and are pre-adolescent children at greater risk of molestation from homosexual adults than from heterosexual adults? There is no reason to believe so. The research to date all points to there being no significant relationship between a homosexual lifestyle and child molestation. There appears to be practically no reportage of sexual molestation of girls by lesbian adults, and the adult male who sexually molests young boys is not likely to be homosexual. [Groth, 1982]

    11. Sexual orientation: More than 70 percent of the men who molest boys rate themselves as heterosexual in their adult sexual preferences. In addition, 9 percent report that they are equally heterosexual and homosexual. Only 8 percent report that they are exclusively homosexual. The majority who molest boys are also married, divorce, widowed or living with an adult partner. [Gene & Harlow, 2001]

    Of all the cases studied by Dr. Carole Jenny, in which she and her colleagues reviewed 352 medical charts of molestation cases for one year in a Denver children’s hospital, less than 1% of the molesters could be identified as gay or lesbian. Conclusions. The children in the group studied were unlikely to have been molested by identifiably gay or lesbian people. [Jenny et all, 1994]

    But I don’t expect you to be convinced if you don’t accept the concensus on HIV, COVID-19, Evolution, or pretty much anything else.

  27. Johnno,

    Since you admit that anal intercourse is bad and cite that some homosexuals do not engage with it.

    I never said that anal sex “is bad”, whatever that means. Nor did I imply that lesbians and some gay men not having anal sex was a good thing – it’s simply a fact. Incidentally, the most dangerous type of sex historically was “normal” sex leading to the life-threatening condition known as pregnancy, which was still dangerous enough to kill my grandmother.

    Are you – swordfishtrombone – willing to therefore preach to the gays [blah]

    This is laughable! Here’s my message to any gay (or straight) people reading this: Life is short. Have as much (consensual!) sex as you want, any way you want, and ignore ignorant haters like “Johnno”.

  28. Anyway, Sprigg is wrong. Paedophiles are attracted to children, not adults. If an adult male molests a female child, that is an example of child molestation, not hererosexuality, and likewise, if an adult male molests a male child, that is an example of child molestation, not homosexuality. Few paedophiles are attracted to adults of either sex.

    Oh you poor sweet child, did you really think you can conveniently just categorize people in a way where they will stay within the definition you label them? That’s not how reality works. And that’s very old fashioned and binary of you to think so as even the LGBT+ alphabet makes room for all the queers and non-binary identities out there. They did that for a reason. Because you can be more than one thing at tbe same time! Do you disagree with this? Then you must be a religious bigot!

    As much as you’d like to conveniently wish this away, the Family Research Council is only citing your preferred political side’s research (we know neither you nor anyone can refute it, so you’re shooting the messenger), the Gays themselves openly admit to this, and there are many quotes we can pull from major public figures stating this, plus there is a pro-pedophilia movement that is active and growing which is coming for your kids, and they are certainly not affiliated with the Family group you have a kneejerk reaction to, nor are they Christians, nor do I think many of them are Republicans if you hate that too, or whatever other excuse you need to keep the facts as far away from you as possible.

    Those facts are that an inordinate amount of those identifying as homosexuals are victims of pedophiles or pedarests, if you want to be specific Mr.Categories, who identify as homosexuals, and themselves, feeling nothing bad was done to them, who also engage in pedophile behaviour. This is why many of them (who are also not affiliated with the Family Research Council) openly admit to the same findings.

    So too bad so sad. As much as you’d like to roll around on the floor, the research is from left leaning outlets, much like your gay choir men who you assure us were “just kiddin!” Well there are certainly kids involved, that much is certain. Maybe their next number can joke about trannies being naked in women’s areas- we’re coming for your women’s spaces tra-la-la-la-la! Oh is the public upset? Just kiddin!

    Also the other things you cited don’t disprove my point. OF COUSE if we’re just going by numbers then heterosexuals, being the overwhelming MAJORITY of people will do most of the crimes. However, a disproportionate number of them from the pool of those identifying as homosexuals are involved in this behaviour and are victims of such, much like a disproportionate number of blacks are involved in crime relative to population size. They will naturally look smaller as a percentage compared to heteros. No surprise there by hiding a tree in the forest.

    “Statistics show that homosexual men, who represent less than 3 percent of the adult male population, commit a disproportionate number (one-third or more) of the cases of child sexual molestation.”

    “Pedophiles are invariably males: Almost all sex crimes against children are committed by men. * Significant numbers of victims are males: Up to one-third of all sex crimes against children are committed against boys (as opposed to girls). * The 10 percent fallacy: Studies indicate that, contrary to the inaccurate but widely accepted claims of sex researcher Alfred Kinsey, homosexuals comprise between 1 to 3 percent of the population. * Homosexuals are over represented in child sex offenses: Those among the 1 to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children.”

    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/report-shows-link-between-homosexuality-and-child-abuse

    The tricks your selected carefully worded quotes try to pull:
    – No link between ‘lifestyle’ and pedophilia. What does this mean? It’s too broad. I also don’t think one’s ability to twerk in a summer parade or fly a rainbow flag is directly a factor on buggering a child. Commonality is not causation.
    – Comparison to lesbians, well women in general across the board don’t do this with the frequency of men, so that’s true, but also a dodge as lesbians are usually victims of both women (rare) and men (which is traumatic).
    – Given there are more ‘heterosexual’ identifying or just presumed as is normal out there, then yes, you are more likely to be victimized by an encounter by someone who doesn’t carry an LGBT card if you ate gonna toss dice, that’s correct, but if you were gonna place a bet on anyone from the available handful sample of cards…
    – I doubt Dr. Jenny’s research from one hospital outweighs the findings of the Archives of Secual Behaviour, so this seems like a specifically cherry-picked stat.

    And finally thank you for clarifying that despite trying to pursuade us earlier that not all homos engage in anal sex (which you did because you felt this a valid point to leverage in your argument), you’ve chickened out as is expected, not only because that would unravel your points (not that they were any good anyway) vut because it demonstrates that you don’t have any balls considering what you’d be up against as you VERY WELL KNOW IT’S ALL ABOUT ANAL, and despite thus you do not have even any consideration or actual love for your fellow human beings except to play political football with their health, mental and physical lives to defend your particular progressive personal religion.

    Then you double down hilariously with the following zinger –

    Incidentally, the most dangerous type of sex historically was “normal” sex leading to the life-threatening condition known as pregnancy

    Whoa-hoh! Stand back everybody! But first a moment to pray for Swishfish’s Grandma’s soul, hopefully she’s in that better place and also interceding for the trombone’s soul.

    Next a big round of applause for the mothers out there who put their immediate lives on the line and their long term lifestyles dedicated to raising children, and didn’t run from the front lines like cowardly ducks by murdering little children in the womb. Following Christ’s example that there is no greater love than to lay down your life for one’s friend. Mothers participate in the work of God by bringing life into the world.

    Bur… if you can kill children in the womb, why not molest them, eh? That’s the thinking of gaydom, superior in their intercourse to the deplorable breeders. Ans as Swordfish might argue, better to molest a chikd than to cut one up to terminate a dangerous pregnancy! Because the sexual intercourse of the gays produces nothing but anal prolapse and STDs! So they don’t worry about that. Which is also why they are more freely promiscious!

    But these brave mothers, are worthy of commendation and protection! Like women’s spaces and the benefit of institutions like say… Marriage!!! Oh wait! Gaydom wants to take that away from them too! Even though they don’t get pregnant and have no need for it except as an empty psychological reassurance of “acceptance” for producing nothing. I mean, what have mothers ever done for us? Make us exist? Raise us? And put the planet a catastrophic jeopardy by overpopulation and global warming and lack of social distancing??? We don’t need that, it’s 2021!!!!

    Now let’s see … which group of DANGEROUS Sex suffers the most depression, anxiety, drug addiction, suicides etc. as a direct result of their ENDANGERING behaviour?

    Turns out it’s not mothers in a stable committed relationship with their husbands. Why… it’s almost as if the risks they took actually reward them with something! Like there’s something useful to building up society going on and they can be open and proud of it without the benefit of artificial corporate parades and miseducation campaigns to constantly reassure their fragile little selves!

    What a wonder!

    So sad that tromboney puts down his own Grandmother like this by comparing what she died for as worse than the sake of cumming into an asshole.

    Sigh…

  29. This is laughable! Here’s my message to any gay (or straight) people reading this: Life is short. Have as much (consensual!) sex as you want,

    >>>>>any way you want,<<<<<<<<<

    and ignore ignorant haters like “Johnno”.

    So with Children too? In the ass? Maybe violently? Some choking, some S and M, some drugs to make it all feel better…? And it’s okay that they receive “safe” education about it… and how to “consent”… to it… all for their safety, right? Swordfish?

    Ah! Such an ally!

  30. Plato anticipated the chaos resulting from the acceptance of revolutionary music; No change can be made in styles of music without affecting the most important conventions of society

    When Dylan staged his Rock n Roll coup at the Newport Folk Festival, a struggle ensued backstage with the old Commie Pete Seeger threatening to use an axe to cut the power to Dylan’s raucous, dissonant and distorted “Maggie Farm” while there were other jews backstage threatening to sue one another but Theodore Bikel scolded them to accept the revolution; ..they are us. They (Dylan’s crummy band) are what we were twenty years ago. Remember?”

    The after concert party was a Dionysian riot with cheap booze and wanton public fornication, like after so many other revolutions (fornication in the streets of Paris after the French Revolution).

    O, and of course, one of Dylan’s fans was the famous faggot Alan Ginsburg who wrote about howling while being sodomised.

    Prior to the 1960s in America no man would be accepted who was “proud to be a sodomite” but the musical revolution – especially rock n roll (Negro slang for fornication)- blowed-up everything.

    And as is typical for a liberal country, the words describing the actions of what the perverts do is punished while the actions of the perverts are praised.

    In America, Christianity is dead, long live sodomy

  31. Johnno,

    Oh you poor sweet child, did you really think you can conveniently just categorize people in a way where they will stay within the definition you label them?

    1. Wierd. 2. Paedophiles aren’t attracted to adults, so they’re not straight or gay, they’re paedophiles. It isn’t rocket science.

    the Family Research Council is only citing your preferred political side’s research

    The FRC (which doesn’t do any research, so should change its fake name) cited it wrong because it’s got a political agenda. I cited peer-reviewed science, which hasn’t got a political side. And I’m not even a leftist: I voted conservative in the last UK general election, UKIP before that, and I’ve never voted for the Labour party.

    Also, this:

    On June 18, 2013, Josh Duggar was named executive director of FRC Action, the non-profit and tax-exempt legislative action arm of FRC. Duggar resigned his position on May 21, 2015, after his history of sexual misconduct as a minor became public.

    Those facts are that an inordinate amount of those identifying as homosexuals are victims of pedophiles […] feeling nothing bad was done to them

    “Feeling nothing bad was done to them”? Are you even for real? What about all the victims of Catholic pedo-priests?

    Also the other things you cited don’t disprove my point.

    Sure they did.

    And finally thank you for clarifying that despite trying to pursuade us earlier that not all homos engage in anal sex […]

    More rambling. Half of gays are lesbians. They don’t engage in anal sex. Thus, the claim that all gay people engage in is anal sex is false. It’s not my fault if you and briggs hear the word “gay” and immediately think about anal sex, forgetting that lesbians exist. Question: Do all straight married couples engage in sex? Is sex the most important thing in most marriages? (Hint: the answers are ‘no’ and ‘no’.)

    Then you double down hilariously with the following zinger [the most dangerous type of sex historically was “normal” sex leading to the life-threatening condition known as pregnancy] Whoa-hoh! Stand back everybody! But first a moment to pray for Swishfish’s Grandma’s soul, hopefully she’s in that better place and also interceding for the trombone’s soul.

    As usual, you’re so busy trying to outdo your own obnoxiousness that you forgot to address my point. Incidentally, my wife nearly died from pre-eclampsia before giving birth to our daughter, and would have died were it not for blood transfusions. So yes, pregnancy *IS* dangerous, and you have no argument.

    Ans as Swordfish might argue, better to molest a chikd than to cut one up to terminate a dangerous pregnancy!

    I hope it’s Christianity that is to blame for making you so gratingly awful, otherwise what is your excuse?

  32. Johnno,

    So with Children too?

    No. It shouldn’t have been necessary for me to include the word “consensual” as it goes without saying, but I included it knowing that you’re so childish that you’d try to twist my meaning and score a cheap point. I *didn’t* realise you’d try twisting my meaning even *with* “consensual” included. I overestimated you. Praise the Lord!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.