
Previous post. Part I of the rebuttals of the objections given last week. Why did God become a man? THAT IT WAS SUITABLE FOR GOD TO BE MADE FLESH 1 However, if […]
Previous post. Part I of the rebuttals of the objections given last week. Why did God become a man? THAT IT WAS SUITABLE FOR GOD TO BE MADE FLESH 1 However, if […]
And it was given him to give life to the image of the beast, and that the image of the beast should speak; and should cause, that whosoever will not adore the […]
You will forgive me if this post is more technical than usual. I try to leave out math, knowing how confusing it can be. But here it is necessary. The Review I […]
Ready to Follow The Science? Let’s listen to the lamentations of its lecturers and lovers. The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. […]
Yesterday I made the claim that academic psychology contained vastly more “banality, ephemera, and outright enforced mandatory quackery than real psychology.” This was proved by a paper written by a gaggle of […]
There is a peer-reviewed paper, with about sixty authors, almost all female, all ensconced comfortably in prominent Western academic institutions, ululating on the relative dearth of females in “psychological science.” (I first […]
Previous post. Another long couple of weeks ahead of us. Why did Our Lord become flesh? Our good saint leads off the best way. ARGUMENTS WHICH SEEM TO PROVE THAT GOD’S INCARNATION […]
I’ve been asked this a million times. ‘Who is Vlad?’ I keep answering that we do not (yet) know, because Vlad himself does not know who he is. Or rather, who he […]
Recent Comments