Item One-year-old prescribed antidepressants by NHS in Scotland
A one-year-old boy was prescribed antidepressants by the NHS in Scotland, as prescriptions for the drugs soared across the UK.
NHS Tayside in Dundee prescribed the medication to 450 children between January and May this year, with the youngest being seven years old.
In 2014, the trust prescribed antidepressants to a one-year-old boy, according to figures obtained by the Dundee Evening Telegraph.
A spokesperson for NHS Tayside told the Evening Telegraph the drugs could be used to treat a number of different conditions beyond their most common use as a treatment for clinical depression…
In very young children, antidepressants can be prescribed for problems including bed-wetting and chronic pain.
Hard to fathom anybody thinking bed-wetting a problem in a one-year-old. But it’s easy to see a frantic mother shrieking at a state-paid medical person to give her “obviously” depressed child drugs. Ask your doctor if profitol is right for you. This same kind of woman, if she belongs to a certain clique, will also be convinced her son is actually a daughter, and will demand “treatment”—so she can brag about it to her friends.
Drugging up kids, especially boys, is now so common, that parents are completely fluent in the language of neural medication. I sat listening to a standard crew talk about two boys who had A then B then C, a little of D, wherein in the other boy, B came before A, and so on. A local “doctor” was well known to hand out pills to all who came to him.
Try homeschooling. Until they find out your homeschooling to stay away from the grips of medical establishment.
Item Miley Cyrus’ split with Liam Hemsworth isn’t just celebrity gossip — it’s a blow to the patriarchy
Over the past week, an assortment of trending stories — from Jeffrey Epstein to the Dayton and El Paso mass shooters, to Miley Cyrus’s separation and Julianne Hough’s declaration that she’s “not straight” — together have laid bare the strictures of an American patriarchy on the edge of a nervous breakdown. As the status quo, heterosexuality is just not working.
Imagine not only equating the satanic and newest resident of Hell Jeffrey Epstein with the “patriarchy” but also being so addle-minded that you know all about the romantic interests of some lousy pervert singer and count that knowledge as wisdom.
Framed differently, the picture is this: Men need heterosexuality to maintain their societal dominance over women. Women, on the other hand, are increasingly realizing not only that they don’t need heterosexuality, but that it also is often the bedrock of their global oppression.
Unless they want to breed and give their brood a father, which all children need. A mother, too. Which is why two men or two women pretending to be married and LARPing as a family is so horrifying.
Item Actually, Dual Loyalties Are A Good Thing.
This question of sporting loyalty, as those who have watched American politics last week will have noticed, is actually not very innocuous at all. It uses sport as a vehicle to drive at something very deep: When push comes to shove, who do you really support? Or to put it another way, what country would you die for?…
This then, is the dual loyalty trope, most recently summoned by President Trump, who suggested that American Jews who vote for the Democrats show “either a total lack of knowledge or great disloyalty”.
The President’s comments unleashed a torrent of justifiable rage, and a flurry of racism allegations. The president’s thinking is this: Jews are loyal to Israel. I’m nice to Israel. Therefore Jews should vote for me. It’s unbelievably clumsy and likely anti-Semitic, at least in implication, and American Jews are right to be annoyed…
To me this seems like a reductive and small-minded understanding of loyalty, which is not a zero-sum game. Unless you insist on a blood and soil volksgemeinschaft concept of a nation, so literally the opposite of America, then some level of dual loyalty isn’t just inevitable, it’s actually desirable. It gives us breadth and empathy and widens our world view…
Viewing dual loyalty as a weakness also misunderstands human nature, seeking to funnel it into a single one-size-fits-all national identity. We humans are large, to borrow the famous old Walt Whitman quote, and we contain multitudes. We contradict ourselves, that is what makes us human.
Whitman was a fool. He pretended to believe opposing propositions simultaneously, changing opinion on a whim being valid.
Anyway, you can’t worship both God and Mammon, even though this Glancy thinks you can.
You’d think they’d purge dual-loyalists from government. Sympathy for a foreign entity or state is one thing, loyalty something else. There will be many instances where the decisions made by dual-loyalists in government favor, in varying degrees, both the home country and a foreign entity. Sympathy can shade these decisions in non-troublesome ways.
Yet there will inevitably arise times in which decisions must be made which favor the home state and which will harm another, or which will harm the home state and favor another. Those with dual loyalty therefore cannot be trusted. One cannot vote for Mammon if one is on God’s cabinet. Dual loyalty brings with it the temptation of treason.
Treason is not a crime much thought of now, not in an age where the elite desire, and speak openly—this is not a conspiracy theory—of a New World Order. That desires for one world government may account for articles like this.
To support this site and its wholly independent host using credit card or PayPal (in any amount) click here
SOMA arrived a long time ago. However, to avoid overdosing, you have to start very young and let the patient develop a tolerance. It helps to increase the parent’s SOMA also. Makes them more compliant.
Bedwetting should not be a problem considering we have disposable diapers that “look like real underwear” for every age in the population. Cheaper than drugs, too.
Eliminating patriarchy should work out about as well as chastity did for the Shakers.
Treason is not much thought of as a crime now—there, fixed it.
The left changed the subject by asserting that Trump’s comments were about Jews, Israel, and dual loyalty. He was speaking about the Antisemitism of the democrat party. ‘Disloyalty’ was relative to the Jewish faith and ethnicity.
I agree that President Trump was speaking about the antisemitism of the democrat party…..and not specific at all to dual loyalty……the democrat party’s anti-judaism is so out in front and not being handled at all by the democrat party’s Pelosi, or Schumer (who is Jewish as is Dianne Feinstein), or anyone in the democrat party’s leadership except for Nadler it seems, though he is still pursuing impeachment against President Trump, poor man.
God bless, C-Marie
“The left changed the subject…” – Robert
Yes. The left perverts everything.
“…the democrat party’s anti-judaism is so out in front and not being handled at all by the democrat party’s Pelosi, or Schumer (who is Jewish as is Dianne Feinstein), or anyone in the democrat party’s leadership …”
Or so you might believe, if your only source of information is the legacy media.
However, in the real world, Congress continues to be led by the nose by a hostile foreign power–with the Democrats far in advance. Continuing the most successful influence operation in history, in August, the largest Congressional delegation in history, paid for by AIPAC, was subject to assessment and development as influence operators for a hostile foreign power:
“(August 11, 2019 / JNS) A total of 41 Democrats and 31 Republicans are in Israel…to express their unconditional, bipartisan support for the Jewish state.
“The delegations are touring Israel’s borders and gaining insight into Israeli advances in areas of defense…the groups met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Blue and White Party leader Benny Gantz and Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas.
“This is the largest delegation that has ever visited Israel,” said House Majority Leader Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.)…at Jerusalem’s King David Hotel. “We have 32 freshman members in our delegation of 41. For many of them, it is their first visit to Israel,” said Hoyer.
“House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said that the U.S. relationship with Israel represents “an unwavering and undeniable bond, and the most important relationship we have in the Middle East. I want to emphasize that this is more than 15 percent of the entire U.S. House of Representatives with you right now.”
How’s that for anti-Israeli demonstration? Might want to switch your sources of information. The real world is much different than you might expect.
Actually no switch is needed at all. Was nice to see both Republicans and Democrats in Israel….hoping much real good comes from their visits, which were separate, though some of the timing overlapped.
When Pelosi reins in the “Squad” and has them repent for their ideological antisemitism, some order may well be restored….but there is courage lacking in the democrats for they still lie concerning “children in cages” which the Obama administration did…not the Trump administration…..etc….so if truth was embraced, that would be a start for the democratic party….but now they have added to the democrat platform, that American taxpayers pay for overseas murders of unborn children and more….let alone the new legality of killing born alive children of abortion. Their only hope is Jesus Christ. Here is hoping that the “Squad” receives Him as their Lord and Saviour and God.
God bless, C-Marie
“….but now they have added to the democrat platform, that American taxpayers pay for overseas murders of unborn children and more….”
Cognitive dissonance is painful.
The Democrats are avid supporters of Israel. Have been for decades. The “Squad” is a sideshow to keep the peanut gallery confused. Again, see the
Abortion? Overseas? Democrats?
Republicans, rabid supporters of Israel, help the American treasury to send $10 million a DAY to fund Israeli government, providing that government with the means to slaughter unborn children, free for all!
“Israel’s abortion law now among world’s most liberal
“Despite its conservative leanings, government approves free pregnancy termination for nearly all women, and it barely causes a ripple”
How to parse that bit of reality? Ever hear American Republican right-to-lifers demanding that Israel restrict abortions? Yeah, no.