A peer-reviewed paper that caused a ripple in awareness before Christmas is worth investigating. Outlets ran headlines like this: “Trans children sense their gender identities at young ages, study suggests.”
Researchers asked the children how much they felt like a boy or girl or something else. They also asked about preferences for toys and clothes that are stereotypically associated with one gender.
The transgender kids showed strong preferences for toys and clothing typically associated with their gender identity, not their assigned sex, the study found. Their preferences didn’t appear to differ based on how long they had lived as their current gender.
Toys are forever and permanently “gendered”, whereas children are fluid. Catch your little girl playing with a truck, slice her tits off. Johnny have a doll in his hand? Then the same surgery can be performed on his pertinents. Because trucks are for males and dolls are for girls—only. It must be that a boy playing with an apron is really a girl, because aprons can only be enjoyed by girls. Everybody knows this indisputable unquestionable scientific fact. Something deep inside a child’s “gendered” body reaches for the sex inside the toy, a sex which is not inside them in any concrete way, but which is fluid.
The paper is “Similarity in transgender and cisgender children’s gender development” by a female named Selin Gulgoz and a bunch of others, mostly females. This identification of sex of the authors is important, because people have been clamoring for more ladies in STEM. Well, now that we have them, we can see the effects. Science has become feelz.
The journal is one of our best. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Gaze upon what has happened to science.
Gender is one of the central categories organizing children’s social world. Clear patterns of gender development have been well-documented among cisgender children (i.e., children who identify as a gender that is typically associated with their sex assigned at birth). We present a comprehensive study of gender development [of kids who] are identifying and living as a gender different from their assigned sex….their sex assigned at birth….early sex assignment and parental rearing based on that sex assignment…
Any scientist who writes “sex assigned at birth” is lost. Sex is not “assigned” at birth. Assigned at birth forsooth! If anything, sex is “assigned”—an asinine word—at conception. Sex is caused by conception. Once caused, it is unchangeable; it is permanent. It becomes what you are.
You may rail against this law, but here is nothing you can do about it except to exit Reality and enter Gnostic Phantasy Land.
To illustrate, due to biological factors, a prototypical girl has XX sex chromosomes and feminized genitalia. Because of these attributes, she is labeled as a girl at birth, and is treated by people around her as a girl. She likely will develop an internal sense of being a girl (i.e., gender identity). [etc. etc.]
Notice how the ladies, and likely effeminate men, who wrote this article paint normality as if it is somehow entirely cultural, as if they, the researchers, didn’t have fathers who sired them with their mothers. Skip all that and let’s get to their “study”.
They asked kids about feelz.
One question (all questions here) was on toy feelz:
Toy preference scores will be computed by recoding items on each trial so that items most associated with a participant’s gender is coded as a 5, those least associated with a participant’s gender (i.e., most associated with the opposite gender) will be coded as 1, and scores 2 through 4 will represent the spectrum between. The items completed will be averaged, and scores will be recoded on a 0-100 scale, such that 100 means a participant consistently selected items most associated with their own gender, and 0 means a participant consistently selected items most associated with the opposite gender.
There it is: toys have adamantine fixed sexual characteristics, and therefore can be used to predict with perfection the “gender” of live human beings.
The results show that normal kids had a mean toy “score” of 68.42 (and not 68.41), whereas those kids being raised by virtue-signalling mothers or gay men (the majority, I am guessing) scored a mean 67.64. Same kind of thing for the clothing “score”. Etc. All the kids were also asked feelz about their “gender.”
Notice—and this is most important—that feelings are the only evidence there is for trannydom. All objective evidence is ruled everywhere inadmissible. Evidence of a person’s biology is said not to count. It must not count! For if it did, and as is obvious to everybody, all manner of trannydom would be reassigned to the psychiatric wing where it belongs.
All that matters is what one feelz. This is the triumph of the feminine in science.
To support this site and its wholly independent host using credit card or PayPal (in any amount) click here