To head this book review, I asked Grok to create an image of the Antichrist in this third, and final, year of reigning over mankind. I asked the model to provide a crown and scepter. I got the scepter.
Those who take AI models seriously will either look at that picture with alarm or hope.
Antichrist, the, is back in the news. Here, for instance, is the article “Voyages to the End of the World” in First Things (no less), authored by Sam Wolfe and one Peter Thiel. Who, many know, is a fan of Rene Girard [my enemies changed this to the wrong name], Catholic, who wrote on the subject often, including one book I See Satan Fall Like Lightning.
St. Robert Francis Romulus Bellarmine (died 1621) is a Doctor of the Church, a rare title awarded to those “on account of the great advantage the whole Church has derived from their doctrine.” He writings are therefore judged worthy of reading.
Some establishment media is still based: you can find good stuff if you know where to look. Like in the PI. Take this op-ed in the Manila Times, by one Richardo Saludo. “When the Son of Man comes, will he find faith?”
…let’s go to Paragraph 675 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 675), the compendium of doctrines the faithful must profess. Subtitled “The Church’s ultimate trial”, the section predicts:
“Before Christ’s second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers. The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the ‘mystery of iniquity’ in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth.”
So, before the last judgment and salvation when Jesus returns, the Catechism warns of a final apostasy or turning away from the faith…
…if Catholicism morphs into a religion heeding man’s wishes, not God’s, then that sounds like apostasy from the faith Christ founded. Indeed, it would fulfill the Catechism’s warning about “the Anti-Christ, a pseudo-messianism by which man glorified himself in place of God and of his Messiah” (CCC 675). This deception “already begins to take shape” when it’s claimed that humanity can attain in this world “the messianic hope which can only be realized beyond history” (CCC 767).
In such a disoriented time, God Himself must come and set things right. Amen.
Some fun can be had imagining a hacker snuck (you heard me: snuck) that in to the New York Times. Perhaps we might request the intercession for such a miracle from our good Saint Bellermine, who wrote of these things in Antichrist, newly translated by Ryan Grant.
Antichrist is part of the larger body of work Disputationes de controversiis christianae fidei, published in parts around 1590. The book is mainly an apologia for Catholicism, answering various Protesting-Christian heresies which claimed the Pope was, or a Pope would be, the Antichrist, these errors being then new and pressing.
Today, only a few small hard-core evangelical, Jack-Chick-tract-welding Dan-Brown-reading sects still believe the Roman Catholic Church will be the Whore of Babylon spoken of in the book of Revelation. The arguments of these people aren’t nearly as sophisticated as those put forth, and now forgotten, by early Protesting Christians and answered by Bellarmine.
Most Christians of any stripe don’t anyway believe Antichrist will come in the form of a real person, whose presence and reign will signal the End Of The World. The literal end. The Final Finis. The Big Bye Bye. The Terminal Ta-Ta. The — (you fill some in).
There is not much point spending time explaining the mistakes about the Pope-as-Antichrists Bellarmine took such pains to refute. We can still will do something interesting with his book, however, for Bellarmine provided us with a primer on who the real Antichrist will be.
Here, then, is Bellarmine’s portrait of the Antichrist.
First, he will be a real person and not a concept. Before he arrives, Christ tells us the Gospel must be preached to the “whole world”. That seems almost a done deal, the exposure being complete except for a few isolated tribes.
Second, the complete “desolation of the Roman Empire” must happen.
[I]t must be known that the Roman empire was divided into ten kings, none of whom will be called “King of the Romans,” although all will occupy some provinces of the Roman Empire in the same way the King of France, the King of Spain, the Queen of England and by chance some others hold parts of the Roman Empire; at length they are not Roman kinds or emperors, but until they cease to hold these dominions Antichrist cannot come.
France is kingless. Spain and England are kinged, but neither gentlemen has any power. Indeed, there are not many places left with governments wielding royal power.
Bellarmine deduces this from various prophecies in the Book of Daniel and Revelation, and such was the opinion (or also deduction) of Church fathers. After this desolation of Rome’s remnants, the kathecon (the Restrainer) is removed and “Satan will be loosed”. “Then there will be a great tribulation, such as had not been from the beginning of the world, nor will be” (Matthew 24). Enoch and Elijah, who never died, will return and tell the world exactly what it doesn’t want to hear. They will be killed for their troubles, be hung out to dry for three days, be resurrected, that miracle causing many to come to their senses.
Now everybody knows that 666 is the number of the Beast, but nobody has any proof of what that means precisely, though there have been a plethora of theories from a host of amateur and professional numerologists. Bellarmine dissects a number of attempts (thank you), all of which (as is clear) have proven false. Some saints say curiosity kills, especially in regard to 666, as it could encourage worship of Antichrist. My idea is that this number will turn out to be banal and thus dismissible by those confronted with it.
Everybody also has heard that all will be required to have “the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name” on their forehead or right hand to buy or sell. That seemed far-fetched until the rise of our surveillance state, the covid panic, and the au courant practice of banks excluding dissident right accounts. Implementing a world-wide system to do this systematically is still, we might guess, a decade or two out. The world is a big place, but shrinking rapidly.
That bit should be emphasized, because it is clear, though Bellarmine does not stress it, that Antichrist worship will be worldwide, with events happening and with people coming to knowledge of those events with some rapidity. That kind of instantaneous communication and marshaling of official action would never have been possible even fifty years ago. After the covid panic, none would doubt it.
Antichrist’s birth will not be miraculous, though it may be painted as such. He will not be the devil incarnate, though he will be possessed by Satan, perhaps from birth. He will be a real man, made from a man’s seed, however implanted, in a real woman. The woman could be a prostitute or similar; she will at least be unmarried. She will be a Jew, probably from the tribe of Dan.
1) Antichrist will come particularly on account of the Jews, and will be received by them as if he were a Messiah; 2) He is going to be born from the nation and race of the Jews, be circumcised, and shall observe the Sabbath, at least for a time.
…Therefore, just as Christ first came to the Jews to whom he had been promised and by whom he had been awaited, and at length also joined the nations to himself, so also Antichrist will first come to the Jews, by whom he is awaited…
Antichrist will rule from Jerusalem, which will be “spiritually called Sodom and Gomorrah” (Rev. 11), and he will be the “king” of three nations, perhaps Israel, Syria and Egypt. His “kingdom” will subjugate the other seven of the ten remnants of the Roman Empire. This subjection won’t necessarily be by force, but could be obtained through diplomacy and could merely mean that Israel (the country, not the Church) sets the pace. Rome itself, which is to say the Seat of the Church, will be overthrown, this time literally.
Antichrist, “will show himself zealous for Jewish laws”, and will attempt to or will rebuild the Jewish Temple, though Bellarmine thinks the attempt will ultimately fail. The “abomination of desolation” will be the mandatory ceasing of offering of the Mass. “Antichrist will command all temples of the world to be converted to his worship, and he will make he own person worshiped.” This implies a one-world, ecumenical-to-the-nth-degree religion. Note that this only has to be promulgated by leaders, and not embraced by all people. This no longer seems an impossible prospect.
Not surprisingly, Antichrist will openly deny Jesus is Christ. He will insist he himself is Christ. He will permit no idolatry. He will work miracles, all of which will be demonically assisted fakes. He will feign death via an injury to his head, then wondrously come back from simulated death. My own guess is that he will say he is harnessing quantum powers of the universe, or some such thing, perhaps even AI, and that others could do miracles, too, once they reached his, Antichrist’s, level of enlightenment; he’ll say that he is somehow the conduit for these powers. People will need such a greedy reason to follow him. I imagine many very minor “miracles”, also demonically assisted, occurring around the globe.
The Jews, always wanting a militaristic Messiah, will at last get one. They will believe and follow Antichrist, and will probably find satisfaction in the great persecution (payback?) of Christians that follows.
But the Jews might not be the only tribe which enthusiastically accepts Antichrist. Muslims are awaiting the Twelfth Imam whose presence signals the End. Muslims also believe Jesus himself will return and slay Antichrist. Buddhists see Maitreya coming, who again shows up for the final battle. Hindus say it will be Vishnu. And so, curiously, on. The world has always been waiting for its end.
What might not be clear is that many Christians might also accept Antichrist. This could be due to a false interpretation of Revelation 20, from which is derived a millennialism or chiliasm, a supposed 1000-year reign of Jesus on earth, a time in which there will be no war or pain.
In Revelation 20, John saw an angel bind Satan: the angel “set a seal on him, so that he should deceive the nations no more till the thousand years were finished. But after these things he must be released for a little while.” The Church says we are in this period now, where the “thousand years” is lyrical for a long time.
“Now when the thousand years have expired, Satan will be released from his prison and will go out to deceive the nations which are in the four corners of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle, whose number is as the sand of the sea.” We are waiting for the expiration of these 1,000 years, after which it will be in the most frightening sense Hell on earth.
Yet some Protesting Christians think this binding will happen after the Antichrist’s reign. These people say Antichrist’s advent will be preceded by a “rapture”, where the sinless (?) are snatched away before Antichrist wreaks his havoc. Others say the Millennium will first happen, then possibly a rapture, then a short period of Antichrist’s rule. Either way, it is thus not a stretch to see how these well-meaning but mistaken folks can be fooled into thinking Antichrist is on their side, since Antichrist will, at first, provide the peace they are anticipating. It is also likely not a coincidence that these Christians are ardent supporters of modern-day Israel (the country, not the Church).
After Armageddon, Antichrist will be slain. Satan will attempt to raise his body toward the heavens in a cloud, in mimicry of Christ’s Ascension; but he will be cast down on the way up.
There will be only two months left of this earth after Antichrist dies. A final moment for the survivors to make their last decision. After which, “the heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything done in it will be laid bare” (2 Peter 3:10).
When?
Bellarmine had the opinion, which he conceded was a guess, that mankind would get some 6,000 years of history (to pattern after Genesis’s six days), which in 1590 meant we had about 400 years to go. This coincides, thereabouts, with the same guess the Mayans made about 2012. Which is to say, about now.
It is true many have said “the time is now”, but that is nothing. We must avoid the One True Spartacus Fallacy, which says that because every man claimed to be Spartacus, there was no true Spartacus. Because so many have guessed wrong does not mean everybody will guess wrong.
My own prediction, not well thought out, is that we have some time left. If I was to wishcast, I’d say within two decades. But, more soberly, I’d say the End won’t come in our lifetimes. My reason is that this book review exists. There are still many in the world who avow Christianity, though the number of (little-o) orthodox is shrinking fast. Too many people know about these prophecies. It would be bad strategy for Antichrist to come at a time when many are on the watch for him.
On the other hand, we have scripture like this (Luke 17:26-29):
And as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all.
Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all.
In other words, expect the Lord to come like a thief in the night. Motus in fine velocior.
An earlier version of this post appeared 6 June 2019.
Here are the various ways to support this work:
- Subscribe at Substack (paid or free)
- Cash App: $WilliamMBriggs
- Zelle: use email: matt@wmbriggs.com
- Buy me a coffee
- Paypal
- Other credit card subscription or single donations
- Hire me
- Subscribe at YouTube
- PASS POSTS ON TO OTHERS
Discover more from William M. Briggs
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Yes, the Anti-Christ will come sooner or later. Better to be prepared to meet Christ at our own demise.
Are you alright Briggs?
Eh… one problem. It’s not explicitly made here, but I’ve seen it made over and over everywhere else, so this post is most likely operating under it too.
There is a misconception that people will be *tricked* into following Antichrist. But that’s impossible, because people *tricked* into doing evil are not doing evil. Grave matter without “full” understanding makes for a venial sin. The turning away from God during the final tribulation – according to my understanding – has to be an evil act, meaning it has to be done with full understanding what is being done. Same criteria as for mortal sin. Which in turn means you can’t be tricked into it. Rather, in my understanding, in the end times people will *understand* they are choosing evil and will do so regardless.
Additional explanation: many people, including many Catholics don’t want to live according to God’s dictates. They’d rather do their own thing. But they can’t because they don’t have a way of existing otherwise. What the evil pair devil-antichrist will do is give people a logical, sane and ultimately credible way out of God’s makeup of the world. This will be backed up by miracles. Truth be told, those miracles might not be fake in any way. Ultimately, the pathway offered will most likely really BE credible, if only you forget that God can remake the World in real time according to his desires, meaning nothing is ultimately credible if it doesn’t have God’s backing. And that will be the trick: people will willfully forget God can remake the World, they’ll say “these miracles stand here unopposed, therefore the path we have is credible”, and then “the desires of their hearts will be made known”, they will defect from God. Entirely out their own doing, will full knowledge they are commiting grave evil, and with full free consent.
And I also think we won’t see the end times because China, that I know of, is not evangelized at all. There’s also the question of those countries that have Christian presence, but either heretical or schismatic, such as actually most of the world (Russia comes to mind). Do they count toward proclaiming the Gospel to all peoples? Or does it really need to be the Catholic Church that proclaims?
If we see that term; “Antichrist” as adjective rather than noun, the pool of candidates will greatly expand.
It’s astonishing that anyone this side of the 16th century takes this hooey seriously.
Cary,
It’s astonishing that anyone, having seen the last century of history, does not.
Ron,
Are you?
I’m convinced that Joe Biden is The Antichrist. It all fits: the head injury (aneurysms), rising from the dead (Auto Pen), consummate evil (declaring Easter to be National Tranny Day), releasing millions of felons, drug and sex traffickers, and murders from foreign prisons and dumping them into America, declaring a new master religion (Climate Holocaust), lies, swindles, miracles (signing 8,000 rapist and murderer pardons in one day while he was hundreds of miles away and in a dementia coma), and starting Armageddon in Ukraine and Iran (the nukes are coming, it won’t be long), and various other acts of demonic evil too numerous to mention.
But I might be wrong. There are many other worthy candidates. It takes an army of demons with lots of Dark Lords to destroy the world.
Ah well. It may be of little comfort to you heathens, but when the world is in chaos like an angry sea, if you keep your eyes on Jesus you can walk on the waves like Peter did, until he looked away. Keep the faith, do not doubt. For He has already defeated Satan.
@Uncle Mike: the thing with prophecies in the Book of Revelation (and really all Biblical prophecies) is that they come true many times in many ways. One of those times is the “main” fulfilment, but they fulfil themselves in lesser ways other times. One of the typical examples is the “mark of the Beast”. Consider: are there societies where the only way to be a full and respected member of society is to commit a mortal sin? For example, are men respected if they don’t have sex? Specifically talking about young men that aren’t married. And without respect can you “buy and sell”? So, has “no buying or selling without the mark” come true?
And I’m not the only one with this idea: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYBIJYLj7xY
All those religions based texts are a combination of fiction, politics, philosophy and living life advice, that sort of thing. The stuff about a creator etc is simply references to an ultimate unseen all powerful authority with correctional powers, helps to cause good behaviour. It’s really not difficult.
Thank you Matt for this article!!! The One World Government and the One World Religion are on their way. Let us all take refuge in our Redeemer, witnessing to Him, Jesus Christ, all the way to Heaven. And He is with us, and will be with us always. And, as, needed, we will know His presence, for Jesus said that He will never leave us nor forsake us.
And, Dear Uncle Mike, I am so glad that you write tongue in cheek and for real!! Your last paragraph is so real:
“Ah well. It may be of little comfort to you heathens, but when the world is in chaos like an angry sea, if you keep your eyes on Jesus you can walk on the waves like Peter did, until he looked away. Keep the faith, do not doubt. For He has already defeated Satan.”
Keep us all Dear Father, Dear Jesus, Dear Holy Spirit!!! And a Blessed full of Thanlsgiving Day and always, all round!
God bless, C-Marie
Everyone needs to go and read PK Dick’s “V.A.L.I.S.” which he said was true but fictiionalised account of what’s going on.
The online world is our graven image and celebrity culture our false idol.
> Too many people know about these prophecies
Fat lot of good that did for Cassandra, finest prophet ever.
Of those poo-poohing, how many of you have read-up on the (many now) apparitions throughout history? Fatima, Loudres, Our Lady of Guadalupe (with the Tilma) to cite three ‘big ones’? Recommend reviewing the ‘biggy’ in 1917 which ended with the Miracle of the Sun in 1917 and of which many secular nooze-types of the time attended?
Or how about the experience of one Jesse Romero, when he was a deputy with Los Angeles’ Sheriffs office working the jail detail, and how he offered death-row inmates their choice of items from the commissary IF they could recite “Jesus is Lord” and through instant ‘seizures’ and other observed body reactions like wild twitches and clenched jaws could NOT in the final stage recite that phrase?
HOW ABOUT the latest analysis (since we have MUCH better tools nowadays) performed on the Shroud of Turin? Have you seen the remarkable results?