Statistics

The Federal Takeover Of Colleges Through Paying Off Student Loans

So the regime is implementing student loan “forgiveness.” Which is to say, it’s having you through your taxes pay the loans of students, so the students pay less, or nothing.

To pay the students is to pay the colleges, at one remove. So this is paying colleges for taking in students they shouldn’t have, and at highly inflated rates. For if there were no loans, the colleges could not have charged anything even close to the rates they did charge.

And if they couldn’t have charged those exorbitant rates, they couldn’t have hired their hordes of DIE zampolit. They couldn’t have cut back on regular professors and swapped them with itinerant adjuncts, which further boosted the power of administrators.

And they couldn’t have necessarily dumbed down college. This is because the greater proportion of kids who attend, necessarily the more towards the average the intelligence of students becomes. Once (most) every kid is made to go to college, like they are now forced to go to high school, college will become, intellectually, a gray goo, with “degrees” having exactly the same value high schools diplomas now have.

This, in turn, will discourage high schools from having to try as hard, since (most) every kid must attend college. College students will become even dumber, forcing colleges to dumb down content even more.

Colleges, most of them, will be federalized to a greater extent. Thus subject to the whims of Experts and rulers.

Pretty soon after this takeover, most peer-reviewed research will be like this peer-reviewed research—the irony of the subject will not be lost on regular readers:

A friend of ours Nick Capaldi, whom we have met before, submitted this brief op-ed to the WSJ (at the time of writing, I don’t know whether it was accepted there, and Nick gave us permission to post here).


The Truth Behind College Debt Forgiveness

Nick Capaldi

What was the real original purpose behind Government subvention of student college loans?

Higher education is the most influential institution in the U.S. It trains everybody from K-12 teachers to journalists to nuclear physicists. To control higher education is to control the commanding heights, the thought process behind all thinking.

Government subvention of higher education was designed to guarantee that college attendees were indoctrinated into the political beliefs of the Democratic Party, namely government control of all the major institutions in the U.S.

The loans were a massive payoff to colleges and universities to achieve that goal. It led to the subvention of programs of ‘grievance’ studies, and their politicized faculty who would otherwise not qualify for serious scholarship, instead of useful careers. It also led to bloated college bureaucracies with activists and lawyers who served as commissars to reinforce the ideology of the political left.

What does this portend? In the name of economic efficiency we shall soon have “free” college education all controlled by the federal government and the Department of Education with its career bureaucratic leftists invulnerable to any change of administration.


Before you go, don’t forget the government has already taken over most “research”. The NIH and NSF, along with the DOD and other agencies, account for the great bulk of all money spent on research.

Which means the government decides what counts as good and what counts as bad research.

Which means people who take these funds are no different than those who take money from “private” entities, like corporations. They all have interests.

Update

Buy my new book and learn to argue against the regime: Everything You Believe Is Wrong.

Subscribe or donate to support this site and its wholly independent host using credit card or PayPal click here; Or go to PayPal directly. For Zelle, use my email.

Categories: Statistics

20 replies »

  1. Please forgive this wall of text. I think it’s important, and is relevant to today’s topic.
    With regards to Joe the Usurper canceling some student debts: You have to understand how modern banking works, especially at the federal (“We own the printers!”) level. It costs them nothing in the short term to cancel debt. That doesn’t mean they won’t still raise your taxes, though.

    Debt is money created out of nothing. It’s an entry in a spreadsheet. When you pay it off, the money returns to being nothing, a ‘0’ in the spreadsheet. Only while the debt is active does the money exist. The trick is that you have to pay real money as the interest. When debt is canceled, the bank loses nothing but the income stream of interest payments.

    Paying off debts is deflationary. The money is returned to sender and destroyed. Canceling debts is inflationary, because the money isn’t destroyed. It’s still out there, being traded around. It’s exactly the same as printing money and handing it out. Okay, well, to be honest, it’s the issuance of the debt in the first place that is inflationary. But if the money isn’t zeroed out again through repayment, it is a permanent net increase in the money supply, making the rest of the currency worth just that bit much less.

    Ah, the joys of modern banking. What, you thought that the banks could only lend out money they actually had on deposit? Silly citizen, that hasn’t been the case for decades.

    In traditional fractional reserve banking, if a bank maintained a 5% reserve, they could lend out 95% of total deposits. In modern fractional reserve banking, they can lend out 19 times their total deposits. And if you put the loaned money back into a bank account, it counts as a deposit.

    As an item of curiosity, the current mandatory reserve rate is: zero. Banks can create all the debt money they like, with no limit. They’re just numbers on spreadsheets, after all. Until the Fed monkeys around with the reserve percentage, forcing small banks to call in their loans, bankrupting small businesses. (Anybody else remember 2008? This is what really happened then to collapse the economy. And when small banks couldn’t meet the new, higher standard, the Fed forced them to sell out to the big banks.) (Never forget that the 2008 recession was a choice the government made. It didn’t happen by accident.)

  2. @McChuck: That’s all well and good until the people who make stuff you need refuse to take those dollars. Unfortunately we live in a global economy and, if we are lucky, the dollar will be the last bad man standing. If we are not ….

    We’re not using the US dollar anymore anyway. What was known as the Greenback ended in 1913. Now all currency is Federal Reserve Notes. Except the Federal Reserve isn’t federal, and there are no reserves. So I guess it’s just Notes …

    But coming back to the federal takeover, I suppose this is the ultimate destination. The government will own everything, eventually. Until it all collapses.

  3. Of course there is to be no debt forgiveness. Forgiveness is alien to the Whos: We do not forget, we do not forgive. The debt will be shifted to taxpaying dupes.

    The Whos “buy” everything with wealth extracted by saddling dupes with usurious debt ponzied-up into a babeling clown tower that they imagine makes them masters of the universe. Until it comes crashing down.

    But just don’t be a dupe and the problem is solved.

  4. Masturbation? They’re going to need more than that, they’re going to need a degree
    in prostitution if they want to eat in the brave new world that is upon us.

  5. Back in the dark ages of the Obama era, during the debate over Obamacare, I bought a t-shirt printed with the curt phrase: “Why do I have to pay for your healthcare…”

    I see I’ll need a new addition to my t-shirt collection: “Why do I have to pay your college loans…”

  6. Everybody’s jumping in and missing the point.

    The students aren’t taking money from you, the government is.

    I can’t help but think there was an element of fraud in student loans; these students were lead to believe that these degrees would pay off and they did not. If they didn’t in fact get their moneys worth, at what point does the lender lose his investment?

    In the Mosaic code, loans were forgiven every seven years, but you can’t discharge student loans even under bankruptcy. Everybody is lining up to bury the 18 year olds who were propagandized about college from the time they were five, when we should be lining up against the brain washers, the banks, the government, and the schools at least as much.

    Sure there is responsibility with the student, but if someone loans me a “new” car to start a taxi service and the car explodes like a firework the first time I turn the key, should I really owe full blue book?

    Plus the government has monkeyed with the economy so hard that part of the reason loans aren’t getting paid back is nobody’s making the kind of money necessary. I’ve been seeing a lot of “get a job” on FB that has been irking me, even guys with sensible majors have had a hard time earning a crust when H1Bs, regulation, inflation, etc. come into play.

    Of course the ideal solution would be to restore some basic economic freedoms and not be trying to actively make war on your native population but “lazy millennials amirite?” Now I know WMB isn’t saying this.

  7. In the bigger picture, Big College is just one example of the pervasive human desire to avoid competition and accountability. Unions and monopolies are bigger examples, with a higher cost to the average citizen, in terms of a lowered standard of living.

    Humans love the consuming side of capitalism, but hate the providing side. Our society strangely allows some groups to avoid the accountability inherent in true free-market capitalism (college professors with their tenure, union members with their seniority, plumbers and electricians and doctors with government licensing requirements, etc, etc etc). Meanwhile, the much-maligned free-market entrepreneur must provide, on average, $100 in value for every $5 in wealth they accumulate.

    Not all the accountability-shirkers have the same degree of control over society, though. When was the last time you hired a plumber for $250 or $500 an hour? If you are even somewhat handy, you do it yourself, screw the local regulations and permit requirements – that bureaucrat at city hall couldn’t care less if an overpaid plumber misses out on the work.

    It’s still not clear to me where a college education falls on the spectrum of provider monopolies. Self-paced online learning is growing by leaps and bounds, with much higher efficiency and a better outcome. We shall see, hopefully sooner rather than later, aided by shortages of competent college graduates.

  8. Milton has a good point about online learning. If you just want to learn something, its never been easier than today. What college sells, as the Wizard of Oz noted, is a credential!

  9. Of course credentials matter though!

    Want a job as an engineer? You can learn a lot online but not much anyone will accept with the exception of some things like programming. Try practicing medicine or law without a license. Try running a hair salon for that matter.

    Same goes for a lot of stuff. The whole “people are lazy” thing is kind of nonsense too. I saw colonial Hong Kong years ago, when people get to keep the fruits of their labor, when there’s a clear connection between your efforts and reward there’s an absolute beehive of activity.

    But acting like nothing has changed since the post war economic boom is false. It’s supposedly about “accountability”, but only the accountability of the student, not the government that wrecked the economy through over regulation, or the colleges that sold the idea that a degree is an entree into the middle class and left out that some degrees even decrease your earning potential (e.g. there are times you’re better off being a stocker at Wal Mart than getting some degrees, you can bet colleges didn’t tell anyone that).

  10. Debt forgiveness and liberating slaves is directly from the Bible but American ain’t too keen on that because bankers.

    On the other hand P.J. O’Rourke sagely observed one could tell the political direction of a society by looking at the women amongst the protestors which is why he knew the Anti-Vietnam War protesters were gonna triumph – they had scores of babes in mini skirts at their protests.

    The right never had a chance…

    Look at the photos of pro-debt relief protesters and then you don’t t need a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing

  11. I have not been able to discover what is actually happening here.

    Are A: the institutions who are currently collecting the repayment and interest on the loans Not going to do so?

    Or, B: are the loans and interest going to be paid by government printing more ‘money’?

    Or something else?

    Only A would count as debt ‘forgiveness’. B would just be yet-another semi-plausible way of deliberately adding fuel to the flame of current inflation to produce hyper-inflation – as a step towards the abolition of money and the imposition of the ‘digital currency’ that They desire as a mechanism of totalitarian micro-control.

  12. There is no substitute for face to face tutoring and mentoring and deep learning when it comes to the sciences, medicine, engineering, maths, accounting, computing, music, language, literature, art etc.

    Online learning is especially well suited for subjects of little real value, such as those found in grievance studies. I am not optimistic about it; my personal view is it is a step backwards.

    Its one thing to have credentials on paper, it’s entirely another to be able to use them.

  13. My wife and I paid back our student loans, like responsible grownups. Now we get to help pay back other people’s loans that we didn’t ask for, didn’t sign for, and didn’t benefit from. Merry Christmas, welchers and leaches.

  14. Hoyos-

    I believe there is one additional benefit the large research institutions still offer students in the STEM space. That is access to large-scale laboratories stocked with advanced equipment and technology.

    There are some types of experiments and research that are simply cost prohibitive to pursue unless one is independently wealthy.

  15. Trade Schools!! Trade Schools!! Trade Schools!!! Graduates always needed!!

    God bless, C-Marie

  16. Student loans are the only type of loan so inherently usurious that people defend the exploitative ways they are set up based on the fact that they are usurious.

    What I mean is that a student loan is based on absolutely nothing. There is no collateral for the loan and no concrete business venture that the loan takes part in. The loan is entirely based on the idea that the borrower will somehow be able to pay back the money based off future earnings, and in most cases neither the student nor the lender even has a vague idea of the field of employment where those future earnings will come from. It is very different from say a situation where I take out a loan to develop a mine at a specific location.

    This is why the inability to discharge student loans through bankruptcy is defended, as well as the high interest rates, etc. Everyone involved recognizes that it would be insane to give out normal loans to students because the default rate would be so high. It would be like giving tens of thousands of dollars to a random homeless guy who says “well I think that once I have money I might be able to get motivated enough to start a business or something.” You could certainly give him the money as a gift if you felt so inclined, but it would be insane to expect to see your money back.

    It is true that the current debt forgiveness program is nothing but a vote grab, though I am not sure if it actually makes the situation worse. Schools were already so reliant on receiving money from federal loans that they were pretty dependent on the government to begin with. Perhaps this exacerbates the situation, but unless the right was going to dismantle the current university system it was going to get worse anyway.

  17. Student loans are just a scam for the Colleges to raise additional money to pay for the DIE groups and activities they’ve been building up over the years. Nothing like a ton of extra money to pay for all the “studies” professors littered all around campus. Think how far tuition would fall if all the leeches were cut out of colleges and universities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.