Been a busy week or two for the regime. They’re having an increasingly difficult time holding back Reality from leaking into the coronadoom narrative. Not everywhere, of course. Austria is moving to full ver-are-your-papers monetary-fines concentration-camps final solution for the unvaxxed. But elsewhere, even once stalwart allies are turning their faces toward the calm sunshine.
This week we learn that if lockdowns worked, we would never have needed masks; and if masks worked, we never would have needed vaccines; and if vaccines worked, we wouldn’t need mandates or passports.
Before all that, some applause, please, for the accurate prediction in the last post, which said an official Ministry of Truth must exist if misinformation exists. The UK is proposing to criminalize misinformation: “Spreading Covid-19 disinformation would also be covered under a crime of sending a false communication.”
JAMA & THE VAXX
Let’s begin with JAMA, a once seemingly unshakable regime tool. Somebody there either made a mistake—maybe the censors took the weekend off—or some editor had an attack of conscience. Because somebody slipped in the paper “Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US From December 2020 to August 2021” by Oster and others. Findings:
Question What is the risk of myocarditis after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination in the US?
Findings In this descriptive study of 1626 cases of myocarditis in a national passive reporting system, the crude reporting rates within 7 days after vaccination exceeded the expected rates across multiple age and sex strata. The rates of myocarditis cases were highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males aged 12 to 15 years (70.7 per million doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine), in adolescent males aged 16 to 17 years (105.9 per million doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine), and in young men aged 18 to 24 years (52.4 and 56.3 per million doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine and the mRNA-1273 vaccine, respectively).
Meaning Based on passive surveillance reporting in the US, the risk of myocarditis after receiving mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines was increased across multiple age and sex strata and was highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males and young men.
First thing we notice is that myocarditis in the young, especially men, after vaxxing is no longer a conspiracy theory. It used to be. It is a now an “official” fact.
Second thing to see are the study dates. This tracking ended August 2021, well before the vax panic had reached full frenzy. The strong-arming increased in fall 2021, which means that rates found in the paper will likely increase.
Third thing is that this study used VAERS, which regime supporters used to dismiss with a scoff. “It’s not official,” they said, “Therefore it’s all a lie,” they wanted you to imply.
Ohhh boy, not a good day for the Narrative…
Not a good day for anyone… pic.twitter.com/lvnpqRhx8n
— Ethical Skeptic ? (@EthicalSkeptic) February 6, 2022
According to the propagandists at Reuters, another long-standing regime organ, “Israel has administered at least 17,904,445 doses of COVID vaccines so far. Assuming every person needs 2 doses, that’s enough to have vaccinated about 98.9% of the country’s population.”
Israel also mandates a “Green Pass” (green for the color skin turns?), i.e. a vaccination passport.
They are also now moving on to their fourth mandated dose. Headline from 17 January: “Israeli trial, world’s first, finds 4th dose ‘not good enough’ against Omicron“.
As of Sunday night, over 500,000 Israelis have been inoculated with a fourth dose. The Health Ministry began offering fourth vaccine shots to Israelis 60 and older, the immunocompromised, and medical workers last month.
And we recall Israel had testing mandates and travel quarantines, besides all the various lockdowns, mask mandates and whatnot.
So much for the “solutions”. What does Reality say?
Maybe this accounts for it:
According to professor Yaakov Jerris, director of Ichilov Hospital’s coronavirus ward in Tel Aviv, “most of our severe cases are vaccinated.” “They had at least three injections,” Jerris told Channel 13 News in describing the typical COVID patient. “Between seventy and eighty percent of the serious cases are vaccinated. So, the vaccine has no significance regarding severe illness, which is why just twenty to twenty-five percent of our patients are unvaccinated.”
You know the old saying: if at first you don’t succeed, go for the fifth mandatory jab.
WHY INDISCRIMINATE VAXXING FAILS
Incidentally, a paper sent in by John Kelleher gives an explanation of why indiscriminate (as opposed to carefully vaxxing only the highest risk group) fails. The authors are not regime friendly, it’s true, so it doesn’t count as a loosening. But it’s still interesting.
“Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNAVaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes andmicroRNAs” by Sene and others. One quote: ” the genetic modifications introduced by the vaccine are likely the source of these differential responses. In this paper, we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health.”
The other very real, and almost certainly true, possibility is original antigenic sin. See our friend Eugyppius on this.
A small study of breakthrough infections provides further evidence that Omicron likely benefits from immune imprinting, or Original Antigenic Sin, in the vaccinated. The authors, mostly from UC San Francisco and UC Berkeley, conducted neutralisation assays on 144 plasma samples from 81 individuals, 63 of them double-vaccinated, and 18 of them boosted. None of the subjects had been infected prior to vaccination, but 53 suffered breakthrough infections. Thirty-nine of these breakthroughs were probably Delta, and 14 were Omicron.
This one counts as a loosening because the paper authors are regime-backed.
A third heretofore reliable regime ally turned coat. Enter “A Literature Review and Meta Analysis of the Effects of Lockdowns on COVID-19 Mortality” by Herby and others, from Johns
Hopkins and other places.
Now we had an analysis of lockdowns way back in the forgotten history of 2020, reported on in our book The Price of Panic: How the Tyranny of Experts Turned a Pandemic into a Catastrophe. Gist: they did nothing but cause harm. Great harm.
Our “discovery”—even the WHO advised against lockdowns in 2019—was reaffirmed in this new paper. Abstract (my paragraphification):
Lockdowns are defined as the imposition of at least one compulsory, non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI). NPIs are any government mandate that directly restrict peoples’ possibilities, such as policies that limit internal movement, close schools and businesses, and ban international travel…[Studies in our meta-analysis] were separated into three groups: lockdown stringency index studies, shelter-in-place order (SIPO) studies, and specific NPI studies. An analysis of each of these three groups support the conclusion that lockdowns have had little to no effect on COVID-19 mortality.
More specifically, stringency index studies find that lockdowns in Europe and the United States only reduced COVID-19 mortality by 0.2% on average. SIPOs were also ineffective, only reducing COVID-19 mortality by 2.9% on average. Specific NPI studies also find no broad-based evidence of noticeable effects on COVID-19 mortality.
While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.
Finding that lockdowns “reduced COVID-19 mortality by 0.2% on average” means finding lockdowns reduced mortality not at all, but 0.2% is far down in the noise, where a sea of other plausible causes exist.
It’s likely impossible to quantify precisely, but their calculation of a “stringency index” showed this:
The regression lines are crude, and unnecessary. But you get the idea. Lockdowns are a huge enormous gigantic monumental failure. They brought no benefit and caused only pain.
So the next time you hear “Covid caused inflation” or the like, spit in the speaker’s eye and say, “No, sir. Government ‘solutions’ caused inflation.”
It should be clear, even to scientists in bed with the regime, that if masks worked, then masks would have worked by now. A simple comparison of those jurisdictions that criminalize maskelssness and those which allow free breathing is sufficient proof. As is the consensus (I use this word in its old-fashioned sense) of studies accumulated over a century, ever since it was discovered that mask mandates were useless in the Spanish flu.
All we have left in favor of masks are badly designed “studies” by the regime, such as the CDC. In their latest, they make the same asinine mistake they made when they declared that vaccine-initiated immunity was superior to naturally acquired immunity.
In that “study”, they only looked at people once they had got to the hospital. Which ignored those who, after having been unvaxxed-infected-and-recovered never got sick again, and so never showed up in the hospital again to be counted as having got sick again!
The CDC Experts never noticed this.
Same thing with their new mask “study”. They only look at people who showed up getting tests. For some reason, they never ever never ever never recall that it’s the panicked getting the most useless repeated tests. And it’s the panicked who wear masks, double masks, double masks with face shields, everywhere.
In other words, it’s much more likely the unmasked who show up to be tested who think they might be sick will be sick, whereas the panicked masked are much more likely to have negative tests.
Many won’t recall, but the CDC has been consistent at producing mistaken studies on masks. The lousy “science” emerging from the CDC makes one weep.
Perhaps the best summary of the usefulness of masks comes from the mayor of Los Angeles, which is provided in this LA Times end-all headline: “LA mayor says he was holding his breath during maskless picture with Magic Johnson”.
Buy my new book and own your enemies: Everything You Believe Is Wrong.
Subscribe or donate to support this site and its wholly independent host using credit card or PayPal click here
Those Israeli death counts look even more alarming when compared to those of the nearby Palestinian territories who didn’t have the resources to vaccinate all their population. Economics forced them to focus on the most at-risk + early treatment.
UK misinformation to be criminalised – yes misinformation like BoJo repeatedly partying through the night while the plebs are locked in their houses living in fear of a police officer’s knock unable to visit their dying grandmothers. Of course it looks like Super-Karen Minister Dorries will be pushing this through Parliament.
True story. During spring of 2020, we had the audacity to drive 500 metres (as the crow flies) from our residence to go for a walk in open country on a coastal headland. When we returned to our car and pulled into the road we were surrounded by two police cruisers (one front one rear) blocking us in for interrogation.
Being the obnoxious individual I am, I was a little bit indignant about this; sitting in the car with wife and young son, we were being treated as if we were terrorists.
“You are not allowed to drive to a place to walk, you must leave from and return to your house.” Said the young female officer (they were both females).
“Who established these rules?” I said. “I have seen no laws prohibiting it or other instructions. We only live about 500 metres from here and by driving we’ve avoided walking through densely populated areas …”
“Go to the website of the World Health Organisation.” I was told by my interrogator.
Uh-huh, this is a lost cause, I was thinking.
Wife told me not to agitate the police any further, nothing to be gained. So I calmed down, said my thank yous and they left us alone at that point.
The global life insurance industry knows the truth. Claims doubled in the vaccination year 2021, at an annual rate.
“The global life insurance industry was hit with reported claims due to COVID-19 of $5.5 billion in the first nine months of 2021 versus $3.5 billion for the whole of 2020, according to insurance broker Howden in a report on Jan 4, while the industry had expected lower payouts due to the rollout of vaccines.”
Garcetti is just shockingly bad at this. The inability of California to produce any notable political talent is stark.
Green pass/Green new deal such Synergy…no cars, no planes, no meat, no heat;
You’ll own nothing and be happy. It’s all laid out in Agenda 21 nothing has
been hidden and everything is right on schedule. Half of humanity is on the
march to perdition dragging the other half with them. The new normal has
arrived with a wrecked economy and broken supply chains millions will
be made homeless and millions will perish. All planned long ago. Imagine
the heady sense of power this must evoke, “now I am become death destroyer
of worlds.” It’s like a world war only much bigger lasting for decades as the
herd is slowly winnowed away. They’re playing for keeps and we just want to
be left alone our programed clarion cry ‘no violence’. Love and hugs as they
steal your gas…
The VAERS stuff is where it became blatant that the thought process was “we know that the vaccines are safe and effective. Therefore reality must be made to conform to this conclusion.”
Even after many of the reports have been pruned, COVID-19 vaccines account for 95% of all deaths in the VAERS database. It should be stressed as always that this means 95% of all deaths in the VAERS database including the many years before the vexxines even existed. Or to put things another way, the number of COVID vaccine deaths is over fifteen times the flu vaccine deaths, despite the vexxines only being given out for a year and change and the flu vaccines going back to 2003 in the database. According to the CDC about 1.77 billion flu shots were given out since 2008 (they don’t list numbers before that.) I can’t find exact data on vexxine jabs, but taking the number of “fully vaccinated” and “at least one shot” and I get an estimate of about 500-600 million in the US. So there have been over 3 times the number of flu jabs, yet over 15 times the number of COVID jabs, making these vexxines at least 45 times deadlier than the flu shot.
And yet when presented with this data the Faucists will not even say “Sure they may be deadlier than normal, but vaccines are generally safe and so even 45 times deadlier is not that deadly.” Instead they deny that there is any increased risk over other vaccines, and sometimes deny that there is any risk at all. They will usually say that the VAERS database is unreliable since it tracks all deaths, vaccine related or not, so given enough time any widely distributed vaccine will rack up a lot of deaths. Except all of that applies to the flu vaccine to an even greater extent (both in number of jabs given and time for people to die afterward), and it doesn’t have nearly as high of kill count. So then you get special pleading of “well people must be intentionally reporting more vaccine deaths for COVID shots because they are filthy anti-vaxxers.” How do we know this is happening? Because we “know” that the jabs are safe, and so if a lot of deaths are reported there must be some alternative explanation.
Briggs: “Been a busy week or two for the regime. They’re having an increasingly difficult time holding back Reality from leaking into the coronadoom narrative.”
Indeed. The coronadoom illusion is getting old and tattered. But never fear, the Masters of Disaster will shortly conjure up a spiffy new illusion to ensnare the rubes in frightening distractions. Hopefully, there will be fewer rubes going forward but no doubt newly minted suckers will step up to replace them. The way of the world.
Our friend Eugyppius — thanks Briggs for bringing him to my attention — has a fascinating round-up of doom reports from his correspondents around the world. Highly recommended:
Containment Collapse: Reader Reports
–>”The inability of California to produce any notable political talent is stark.”
It may be stark, but who gets elected has little to do with political talent. What comes closest to determining election is the Q-score used in media. Surface impressions are of greatest importance, substantive policy is the caboose of the political train.
“LA mayor says he was holding his breath during maskless picture with Magic Johnson”.
He didn’t hold his breath nearly long enough.
Just a note emphasizing that the non-Regime paper Matt cited above, “Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations,” gives a plausible causal pathway by which these mRNA Vaccinations might ‘give’ you (greatly increase your risk of developing) cancer.
The authors find support for that possibility (which – to be fair – at this point they agree is only theoretical). Despite the fact that cancers typically express over months if not years, the VAERS data already shows that “twice as many cancer reports to VAERS are related to a COVID-19 vaccination compared to those related to all other vaccines” (that is, compared to all other vaccines combined over the 31 years VAERS has been collecting data).
The vex might give you cancer. I wonder if Karen may want to know that.
NO MAN MAY HONK-HONK THEIR HORN TO PROTEST THE MARK OF THE VEXX!!! We’re here! We’ve done it ladies and gentlemen! Judges have gone clown bonkers!
Archbishop Vigano backs the honkening!
Planned Unparenthood signals the end of mask mandatums… so that public health EXPERTS can salvage their reputations in order to trick us again next time after you’ve forgotten!
Canadian police are jus’ followin’ ordeuvres
But this basef Canadian policeman will NOT jussie smollet orders.
Austria committed to remain full Vaxzi right up to at least 2024!
Canadians show their unmasked middle fingers to Vaxzi Nova Scotia.
Vaxzi Oregon makes masks permanent for school children until they feel otherwise, so, forever!
Meanwhile New Jersey ends mask mandates for schools.
NO CALIFORNIAN MAN MAY NOT WEAR A MASK WITHOUT THE MARK OF THE VEXX!!!
Toronto attempts rebellion/insurrection/racism/etc.
Meets Germany’s ‘Joys’
One of Castreau’s bodyguards resigns.
Vexxine harms are a sign of vexxine success! It is your eternal reward for following THE SCIENCE ™! Rejoice, your faith is not in vain! Your death or injury was for the greater good!
Family Guy – You’ve got aids song . Mp3
Israel rethinking the Mark of the Vexx…
Terrorist van that ran over Winnipeg protestors seems to have had a responsibly masked Antifa member inside of it at the time. Police and media are looking into it before jumping to conclusions and assigning blame.
Tucker on the trucker
1. This is by one professor of applied economics at Johns Hopkins (and the Cato Institute), a ‘special advisor’ at the Center for Political Studies in Copenhagen, and a professor emeritus in economics at Lund University. None of them are epidemiologists.
2. It’s a working paper, not a peer-reviewed paper published in a journal – anyone can self-publish anything and call it a ‘working paper’. I could publish one. Also, working papers aren’t endorsed by Johns Hopkins.
3. It only looked at 34 studies, ignoring many peer-reviewed studies which show that lockdowns work, while including 12 working papers, and 14 by economists. Only 1 study was by epidemiologists.
4. It counted any mandated intervention as a lockdown, so a mask mandate would count as a lockdown. A mask mandate isn’t a lockdown!
5. Lockdowns weren’t supposed to reduce COVID mortality, they were designed to reduce hospital overload. Even I remember that from when this all started, it was stated plainly during press conferences.
Yawn… MinistryofFish should spare us the pretense and just link us to the fak-checka he copy/pasted that from.
The only requirement for the purposes of this paper is that they know mathematics.
They are searching through various papers and studies to quantify measurable results of how many were saved or dead.
Why is an epidemiologist required to do a body count and measure negative social and economic impact?
Okay… So is it right?
FAK-CHAK! Missing Context!
This study employed a systematic search and screening procedure in which 18,590 studies are identified that could potentially address the belief posed. After three levels of screening, 34 studies ultimately qualified. Of those 34 eligible studies, 24 qualified for inclusion in the meta-analysis.
And ah yes… “peer review” such a fool proof system! Especially when alternatives were refused even the dignity of submission a-priori, like all those lab-leak ones… which is of course IS the point. Why is this slipping through the cracks now all of a sudden… hmmm?
Well, can the fish tell us what the ignored “We proved it!” papers are? Were they early papers based on… oh… models that prove models work? As opposed to real world data that we now have that they couldn’t? Hmmmm?
Well I’m reading it and it says…
Lockdowns are defined as the imposition of at least one compulsory, non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI). NPIs are any government mandate that directly restrict peoples’ possibilities, such as policies that limit internal movement, close schools and businesses, and ban international travel.
Today, it remains an open question as to whether lockdowns have had a large, significant effect on COVID-19 mortality. We address this question by evaluating the current academic literature on the relationship between lockdowns and COVID-19 mortality rates.3 We use “NPI” to describe any government mandate which directly restrict peoples’ possibilities. Our definition does not include governmental recommendations, governmental information campaigns, access to mass testing, voluntary social distancing, etc., but do include mandated interventions such as closing schools or businesses, mandated face masks etc. We define lockdown as any policy consisting of at least one NPI as described above.4
For example, we will say that Country A introduced the non-pharmaceutical interventions school closures and shelter-in-place-orders as part of the country’s lockdown.
So why are they doing this?
Compared to other reviews such as Herby (2021) and Allen (2021), the main difference in this meta-analysis is that we carry out a systematic and comprehensive search strategy to identify all papers potentially relevant to answer the question we pose. We identify 34 eligible empirical studies that estimate the effect of mandatory lockdowns on COVID-19 mortality using a counterfactual difference-in-difference approach. We present our results in such a way that they can be systematically assessed, replicated, and used to derive overall meta-conclusions.
What this means is that they wanted to be fair and compare and contrast data from different strategies, which also means that despite masksworkfish’s protestantism, there was never any government lockdown policy anywhere on earth that didn’t include masks, but they did differ to varying degrees on where you required them and at times who required them and when they were coercively forced on the public and not just a recommendation, so the point is entirely moot. The paper set the standard vague enough to have any one criteria count, but ends up requiring nearly all of above. This is a precision requirement in searching for material and highlighting it in the search criteria when writing the paper to disclose this fact.
They are searching for any and every paper dealing with it so as to stack the deck in THE SCIENCE ™ ‘s favor and not skimp on any detail.
They are being thorough and doing their job, and when sorting through the search results will keep only the relevant ones.
Let’s break this paragraph of stupidity down…
Hospital overload in itself implies potential higher rates of mortality.
Because those who don’t get treated in a hospital when they really need it, might die.
That is why we don’t want to overload hospitals.
To prevent deaths.
Not to make life easier for Nurse Joy so she has free time to organize Tik-Tok dance-offs.
Lockdowns were therefore to prevent illnesses – STOP DA SPREAD – because fewer illnesses means fewer deaths.
And we are very very concerned because we believed that this illness of the covid had a very very strong possibility of death.
Because if it didn’t have a very very strong possibility of death, then what the trumboney is implying here is that there qas NO PANDEMIC, and we were locking down over sniffles and something you could sleep off or handle with regular cheap over-the-counter prescription medicine!
Is that what trumpbone is saying? This was not actually about preventing deaths but only so that hospital staff could still get their weekends off and not work too hard?
If this was not about preventing deaths, then what was it about?
What was the end goal of FLATTENING THE CURVE supposed to be? Saving money by not having to set up tent cities and outdoor facilities and medical ships to house all the sick people that never showed up? But they set those up anyway, so that couldn’t be it!
So what are the vexxines for? Saving our lives or keeping us (ah-hahaha) out of the hospital? Because it seems that is doing the opposite. Or it works by outright killing you.
GREAT EXPERT NEWS! CLIMATE CHANGE MODELS WERE ALL WRONG! THEY MODELLED THE CLOUDS WRONG! THEY NEED BETTER COMPUTER!
The EU members you do-not-can-not vote for are MARK OF THE VEXX REMAINERS!
Things are looking bad in the polls, so Australian PM is maybe signalling allowing travel restrictions to slightly decrease… just a little… just a little…
“INSURRECTION! OCCUPATION! MAYHEM! TERRORISM! THIS IS MADNESS! THIS IS NOT SPARTA! THIS IS STATE OF EMERGENCY!”, screams Ottawa’s hersteric mayor at the trucks.
CDC admits vexxine heart problems! Will solve this by hastening vexxine schedule! Get your 4th shot faster! Problem solved!
China building new Great Wall to keep out the civid because vexxines didn’t do the job! But how…? HOW??? ??????
THE SCIENCE ™ was being very mean…
USA! USA! The USA! is moving to end the corona-farce! See how they run!
You don’t say…
Did the British really have an empire?
Seems to me like they’re just a bunch of fags.
Good news! I am hearing more people are using terms like “regime propagandists” and even “messenger for the devil” when referring to the MSM.
Wait just a darned minute!!!
ALL that this cascading set of WuhanV reality studies tells us is that REALITY has failed to do its part to live up to the Narrative that Explains Reality.
What the hell is the problem?
Since we know for Woke Certain that there is not a singular Truth ….because the presence of that kind of Absolute would be Non-Inclusive and Non-Diverse… then any so-called study that tells us Masking Fails when compared to Reality ( https://reason.com/2022/02/07/that-study-of-face-masks-does-not-show-what-the-cdc-claims/ … https://unherd.com/2022/02/were-masks-a-waste-of-time/ ) MUST be wrong, meaning Reality must be wrong.
As Shullenberger notes in that latter article: “”The most disastrous failing of the experts has been their lack of curiosity about the actual results of the policies they have staked their reputations on.” What he fails to realize is that this deliberate ignorance, this blind confidence, is the natural result of Narrative Surety. No reason to check reality against what we already KNOW is True. Either Reality will verify what we know or
reality will be revealed, yet again, as being incomplete & misleading requiring obfuscation, extensive quibbling & further analysis at some future, undetermined time by Experts TBD.
“”I don’t know what you mean by ‘masking & vaccines work’?” Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. “Of course you don’t—till I tell you. I meant ‘there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!'”
“But ‘masking works” doesn’t mean ‘a nice knock-down argument’,” Alice objected.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”
Seems clear to me!
WHITE HOUSE ADMITS LOCKDOWNS DID NOTHING!!! BUT IT WAS ALL TRUMP’S FAULT!!!!! BLAME HIM!!!
Looks like that “not-peer-reviewed” John Hopkins study is making the rounds, being cited, and making a significant impact everywhere amongst all the official experts! Somewhere a lonelytrumbone is screaming! He is screaming underneath his mask!
THE SCIENCE ™ follows approval ratings! Mystery!
The Vaxzi Calgary police are abusing pastors again.
Nee Zealand kicks off their convoy!
Castreau has recovered from the covid, but his brain sure hasn’t…
A vexxine death??? It can’t be!
SASKATCHEWAN TO SET ITS PEOPLE FREE! FREE!!!
Good news! The majority of Canadians are now nazi-flag waving racists!
THE SCIENCE ™ wouldn’t force doctors to lie… would it???
Sweden lifts the little remaining placebo restrictions it had only to placate THE SCIENCE ™
This party never stops!
After the 4th vexxine everything will be over threatens the Fauci.
New York to ditch masks… because WE FOLLOW THE SCIENCE ™! IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH OUR COLLAPSING POLLS OR TRUCKS, OKAY?!
Watch THE SCIENCE ™ changing in real time!
GiveSendGo does what GoFyo’self can’t!
Alberta drops the MARK OF THE VEXX!
Vaxzi Austria sends out Vaxzicutioners to STOP & CHECK VEXXES!
MARK OF THE VEXX is very convenient for other things in China! Who’da thunk?
Russia to kick off their convoy!
“Revoke their licenses and insurance!”, screeches Canada’s hersterical transport minister.
The Vaxzi Ontario Health Tzar has hardened his heart.
Heather McDonald goes down in infamy… and likely vexxine injury….
Vaxzi Quebec Tzar says the quiet part out loud… “some restrictions will end, but we’ll have to keep the big ones and we could clamp down again later.”
ALBERTA NOT ACTUALLY LIFTING RESTRICTIONS! THEY TRIED TO PULL A FAST ONE! TOO BAD!
HErsterical CDC is losing control… good!
Uh… oh… again…
Fiendish Dr. Wen wants to compromise.
Toyota and Ford shutting down their plants in Canada because of the truckers are blocking their way??? What wonderful news! Quickly! Tell the media! The Truckers are helping to save the climate from the change!
Vaxzi New Zealand will not stand for all this convoying around!
The almost Great Escape! Soon to be a major motion picture!
Welcome to Australia! Please go directly to Covid Camp. Please pay $2000 Australian dollars.
The Funding War continues… Big Fat Ford and the Ontario Vaxzis have frozen the GiveSendGo funds.
“Slash their tires! Arrest them all!!!”, screeches hersterical CNN Harvaard Expert.
More UK doctors stepping out to blow the whistle.
The Department of Homeland Security is watching you potential terroristic truckies…! So don’t get any big ideas!
When all the fak-chaked conspiracy theories become true expert official TV narrative… where will the trumbones turn to now to tell them what to think?
Vaxzi Ontario is in a State of EMERGENCY! AHHHHH!!!!
There is nothing more unsettled than settled science…
My MRNA clot-shot is better than yours!
TD Bank is stealing/freezing convoy money. Time for a bank run!
The convoy in Paris!
The Vaxzi Gestapo have arrived to just follow orders.
Pfizer’s wish to harm to children has been delayed…
NO AMAZON WORKER MAY RECEIVE PAID MEDICAL LEAVE WITH COVID WITHOUT THE MARK OF THE VEXX!
The CDC is screaming! It is screaming under its masks!
Mock trial for ctimes against humanity begins.
Cracks in the liberal dam.
The Trucker Convoy should form its own polirical party.
NO MAN SHALL BE HIRED TO WORK AT THE 2022 OSCARS WITHOUT THE MARK OF THE VEXX… unless they are a celebrity…
Tucker in truckers and trudopes
GiveSendGo has been hacke…!!! oh… wait… no, it was just a url redirect… Nice try, THE SCIENCE ™!
Pfizer changes its mind when India asks to test the product first.
The convoy reaches the steps of the EU!
“FOREIGN INSURGENCY!!!”, screams the Vaxzi lady Ardern.
Forced and punishing vexxine mandates have lead to drop-off in vexxine uptake and increased citizen insurrection, the befuddled Vaxzi Austrian government discovers!
La Crete, Alberta, did nothing, handily beats all its the lockdown/vexxine enthusiast competition, but how…? HOW???
Police are openly sabotaging vehicles. They had to! They were probably going to be used for terrorism!